FPGA, SoC, And CPLD Boards And Kits
FPGA Evaluation and Development Kits
Announcements
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.
6478 Discussions

Updating Yocto from Nanbield to Scarthgap Error

james57
New Contributor I
1,037 Views

Hi there,

I am currently looking to update the version of linux I am building for from the previous nanbield-4.3.4 on GSRD to the new lts scarthgap-5.0.2.

I have run the commands from the GSRD to do so a few times and contiune to run into the same error continuously. After starting the bitbake core-minimal-image command the bitbake process starts to parse recipes, when it fails due to an error.

I will post a screenshot of the error it encounters.

The issue is due to the following .bb file, openssh_9.6p1.bb located in gsrd_socfpga/poky/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh
The .bb file calls for fix-potential-signed-overflow-in-pointer-arithmatic.patch, but this file does not exist in the current version of scarthgap-5.0.2, or in the master branch.

scarthgap:
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/tree/scarthgap/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh/fix-potential-signed-overflow-in-pointer-arithmatic.patch

nanbield:
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/blob/nanbield/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh/fix-potential-signed-overflow-in-pointer-arithmatic.patch

I attempted to modify the .bb file to not call the SRC_URI of the needed .patch file but was unable to find the correct location of the call.

The file still exists in the older nanbield version, and yocto builds when I insert the file into the correct location however this is a lazy fix as I am still counting on outdated versions and would like to change to the new lts.

Am I missing something or was this overlooked?

Cheers,
James

Labels (1)
0 Kudos
1 Solution
james57
New Contributor I
843 Views

Hi

This was overlooked in the July 26th revisions of the Rocketboards builds I was referencing, luckily this issue was addressed on the 8th and 9th of August in revisions 78 and 79 for the Agilex I-Series SoC respectively.

 

https://www.rocketboards.org/foswiki/diff/Documentation/AgilexSoCGSRDSIAGI027?oldrev=78&newrev=79

 

Cheers,

James

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
1 Reply
james57
New Contributor I
844 Views

Hi

This was overlooked in the July 26th revisions of the Rocketboards builds I was referencing, luckily this issue was addressed on the 8th and 9th of August in revisions 78 and 79 for the Agilex I-Series SoC respectively.

 

https://www.rocketboards.org/foswiki/diff/Documentation/AgilexSoCGSRDSIAGI027?oldrev=78&newrev=79

 

Cheers,

James

0 Kudos
Reply