- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
Hello.
I'd want to know the intel i. graphics performace & problems with webgl word
(for example http://threejs.org/ http://threejs.org/, http://helloracer.com/racer-s/ http://helloracer.com/racer-s/ )
I need to know if these graphics cards can hold / support the effort that WEBGL can ask them.
Can be dangerous for the card ? Can be reduce the expected card life ?
Can have seroius heat problems ?
Thanks.
링크가 복사됨
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
Well, modern WebGl apps are targeted to OpenGL ES 3.0, which itself requires OpenGL 4.3 support. Only Haswell and newer generations have full support of current OpenGL versions.
About load on IGP, WebGL apps are usually a light-weight demos and casual games, because full-fledge game will be too large to fit into browser and likely will use a plugin with more capable rendering engine like Unity. But this will be changed with HTTP 2.0, because binary transfers will make possible game resources streaming and fast interactions.
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
What about this , http://potree.org/ http://potree.org/
This example can manage millions of points.
What can be the behaviour and effort of intel card?
Which can be the limits ? Which alerts could be recommended (if any) ?
Finally, where are the limits to say 'your card may be damaged' ?
Thanks
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
Intel GPUs have same protections as discrete: if temperature or voltage become over limit, they will switch to lower performance levels or start throttling. In you can see an example of GPU defense.
