- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is a bug of Intel oneAPI 2022.0.2: ifort and ifx crash when compiling the code posted below. Even though the code itself is NOT valid Fortan, compilers should not crash.
The latest version of the code is available in my GitHub repo dedicated to testing Fortran compilers.
System: Ubuntu 20.04
Error messages:
$ ifort --version && ifort -c test_ieee.f90
ifort (IFORT) 2021.5.0 20211109
Copyright (C) 1985-2021 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
test_ieee.f90: catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error: segmentation violation signal raised** Please report this error along with the circumstances in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error.
compilation aborted for test_ieee.f90 (code 1)
$ ifx --version && ifx -c test_ieee.f90
ifx (IFORT) 2022.0.0 20211123
Copyright (C) 1985-2021 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0x1362f1a]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0x102d09d]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0x1084382]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0x10844b0]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x430c0)[0x7ff4367dd0c0]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xf1f9cf]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xf3e3a6]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xe30ad8]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xf52c09]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xf529f4]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xe021e9]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xe787c8]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xe86cc0]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xe7f520]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xeaed14]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xeaff35]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0x10737be]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xf9c865]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0x1116541]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3)[0x7ff4367be0b3]
/opt/intel/oneapi/compiler/2022.0.2/linux/bin-llvm/xfortcom[0xde27a9]
test_ieee.f90: error #5633: **Internal compiler error: segmentation violation signal raised** Please report this error along with the circumstances in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report. Note: File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error.
compilation aborted for test_ieee.f90 (code 3)
Code:
module test_ieee_mod
! test_ieee.f90
! N.B.:
! 1. This piece of code crashes ifort (IFORT) 2021.5.0 20211109 and ifx (IFORT) 2022.0.0 20211123
! 2. The following code is NOT standard-conforming, because IEEE_VALUE cannot be used in the
! initialization. However, compilers should raise an error instead of crashing.
use, intrinsic :: ieee_arithmetic, only : ieee_value, &
& ieee_quiet_nan, ieee_signaling_nan, ieee_positive_inf, ieee_negative_inf
implicit none
private
public :: ieeenan, ieeenan_q, ieeenan_s, ieeeinf, ieeeinf_p, ieeeinf_n
real, parameter :: ieeenan_q = ieee_value(1.0, ieee_quiet_nan)
real, parameter :: ieeenan_s = ieee_value(1.0, ieee_signaling_nan)
real, parameter :: ieeenan = ieeenan_q
real, parameter :: ieeeinf_p = ieee_value(1.0, ieee_positive_inf)
real, parameter :: ieeeinf_n = ieee_value(1.0, ieee_negative_inf)
real, parameter :: ieeeinf = ieeeinf_p
end module test_ieee_mod
Link Copied
5 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Barbara_P_Intel Sorry for bothering you with another bug of Intel oneAPI. Thank you for having a look.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Devorah_H_Intel Sorry for bothering you, but it would be great if you could have a look at this bug. Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I filed a bug report for you, CMPLRLLVM-35795. I'll post when a fix is available.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The fix for this issue will be available in the next release.

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page