Barbara:
The code.zip includes the Fortran files from the original LINUX development set. These are also included in the ZEUS.zip.
Base.f90 I added to set up a standard set of parameters, I am following the @mecej4 suggestion in Magni.
Draw.F90 is simply a drawer I added to look at the data, it is all old code in essence. Assuming your algorithm is working without looking at the data is a really bad idea, but it is common issue with theoretical people who often fail to understand experimental limitations. Try to explain a analog to digital step issue to a theoretical boffin is an exercise in needing another beer at 8 am.
The code.zip is all the original, to get it running with draw I needed to add heaps-array and set heaps to 0 and stack to about 1 billion.
My main machine did not load IFX as we discussed in the fail to install posts. I can run it on the NUC Core I3 with Windows 10 as these machines are stuck in time, but the install worked as you intended and IFX is perfect there.
The LINUX original is an academic exercise, so it is a good algorithm and nice code, but there is stuff lumped everywhere and multiple definitions of the same parameters. I am a firm believer that parameters are defined once in base. So if your people ask why is THREE defined, it is in base and is used everywhere.
The mn_?? were in the original idea for base from wherever and as a doff your hat to the past I keep using them. But due to historical use mn_2 is not always defined as 2. We are all quirky.
I hope this helps.
John
Thanks for the help.
Re humour, the NSF did a big study and showed that you need at least 1 women in each group of 10 men to turn the men into something approximating normal humans. I have tried to explain it to my daughters, but you see if you have say 2 men and they are talking and you add a lady you end up with a completely different polite conversation. If you want a great example, read John McNab by Buchan - it is from the 1930's but it is in pdf and it has a very strong female lead character and it is funny.
They also did a study of university departments, those departments that are filled with crusty old curmudgeons that do not care or understand their student problems have a lower graduation rate compared to departments where they could find one professor "who seemed to care". If the University graduates 55% instead of 65% it should be closed in the real world it would fail. Mr Chips explains it better.
Professors who seem to care are pariahs in University Departments as they tend to solve problems that the others like to impose, academic departments are the worst example of a 5 yr old king of the mountain games, played with words instead of sticks.
I like this place as the crusty old curmudgeons are mostly tame. LOL Mostly...
Sorry, but my daughter is doing a list, I have four daughters so my life is terribly polite.
