- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
We're seeing a difference in one file's execution on an AMD processor (sorry, don't know speed or details). I did not have any "require" extensions in the compile and have tried both "blended" and "pentium 4" "compile for" options.
Does anyone have any ideas of other compiler options that might be coming into play?
Linda
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Result differences would be understandable. This is an "error condition" that we detect that is not detected on any pentium (or with several other compilers, debug modes, etc) but is showing up on the AMD machine. That's the odd part.
Same code, virtually, with all the other compilers.
Linda
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Most 32-bit Athlons were P-III compatible. With recent Intel compilers, -QxK would work, but not -QxW. -QxW should be OK for AMD 64-bit desktop processors. Turion has been known to have problems with SSE2 instructions. Some of the issues are undocumented.
You also need to know whether a 32- or 64-bit OS is installed, and don't try to run incompatible combinations. 32-bit applications, with all necessary 32-bit libraries present, should run on 64-bit OS, but not the other way round.
There are quite a few issues to keep straight, and guessing won't cut it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It may come down to that. Unfortunately, the team member with the AMD machine is in Chicago and I am in Colorado.
I did try the /Qxn compile -- crashed right out of the starting gate for him.
I do have some hints though as he is seeing some odd errors that I found when I ran the g95 compiler on a different problem (it does not see this problem).
Thanks for the help.
Linda
![](/skins/images/B7BA37F9CE4B52FF7CAE1FB0388839C8/responsive_peak/images/icon_anonymous_message.png)
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page