- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
Hello -
Has anyone worked on getting FIPs compliance with a version of IPP other than 5.0? I know 5.0 was tested for FIPs compliance, but does anyone know a way to get later versions (specifically v7.0) approved?
Thanks in advance for any insight.
링크가 복사됨
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
Sergey -
Thank you, I saw that post. Unfortunately, we are using v7.0, and for FIPs the version we are using specifically has to be compliant (that only shows v5.0 compliance). If you (or anyone) knows some one to contact about this, I would greatly appreciate the assistance.
Thanks!
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
This topic is currently under discussion. No guarantees about whether IPP will pursue FIPS certification again, but more info will be posted here as product plans are approved. BTW, are you interested in working with the IPP crypto primitives themselves or the IPP-optimized OpenSSL sample? As you've probably seen, IPP's OpenSSL sample was discontinued in IPP 7.1.
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
We are interested in the crypto primitives. Is there anybody specifically that we can speak with? We are using a test lab for certification, and maybe there can be some cooperation between Intel and them for getting the soecific crypto module in our software certified.
Thanks.
- 신규로 표시
- 북마크
- 구독
- 소거
- RSS 피드 구독
- 강조
- 인쇄
- 부적절한 컨텐트 신고
John,
Only an old IPP 5.0 worked on the FIPS certification. The newer versions of Crypto functions do not work on certification process.
Regards,
Chao
