- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I gave the same parameters in JM and intel ipp ( same input sequence, bit rate, quantisation etc) and intel ipp beats JM in all the parameters i measured ( mse, psnr, and ssim).
1. Could some one please give me one good reason as to why is it almost 500 times faster , and better than JM output. What is making the compiler special ? Is motion estimation done in a different way in this encoder ?
2. what is this parameter " speed/quality grade [0,3] (0-maximum speed, 3-maximum quality) " all about ? what parameters are set to default when
a. 0,0 ( maximum speed, min quality ) is selected
b. 3,0 ( minimum speed , max quality ) is selected
Regards,
Suchethan
1. Could some one please give me one good reason as to why is it almost 500 times faster , and better than JM output. What is making the compiler special ? Is motion estimation done in a different way in this encoder ?
2. what is this parameter " speed/quality grade [0,3] (0-maximum speed, 3-maximum quality) " all about ? what parameters are set to default when
a. 0,0 ( maximum speed, min quality ) is selected
b. 3,0 ( minimum speed , max quality ) is selected
Regards,
Suchethan
Link Copied
1 Reply
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - suchethanswaroop
Can someone please reply to this thread... I am waiting for a loong time for the answer..
Regards,
Suchethan
I gave the same parameters in JM and intel ipp ( same input sequence, bit rate, quantisation etc) and intel ipp beats JM in all the parameters i measured ( mse, psnr, and ssim).
1. Could some one please give me one good reason as to why is it almost 500 times faster , and better than JM output. What is making the compiler special ? Is motion estimation done in a different way in this encoder ?
2. what is this parameter " speed/quality grade [0,3] (0-maximum speed, 3-maximum quality) " all about ? what parameters are set to default when
a. 0,0 ( maximum speed, min quality ) is selected
b. 3,0 ( minimum speed , max quality ) is selected
Regards,
Suchethan
1. Could some one please give me one good reason as to why is it almost 500 times faster , and better than JM output. What is making the compiler special ? Is motion estimation done in a different way in this encoder ?
2. what is this parameter " speed/quality grade [0,3] (0-maximum speed, 3-maximum quality) " all about ? what parameters are set to default when
a. 0,0 ( maximum speed, min quality ) is selected
b. 3,0 ( minimum speed , max quality ) is selected
Regards,
Suchethan

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page