Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives
Deliberate problems developing high-performance vision, signal, security, and storage applications.
6709 Discussions

ippiDecodeHuffman8x8_Direct_JPEG_1u16s_C1 seems ineffective!

cloud007
Beginner
‎08-30-2005 06:22 AM
255 Views
After I replace the huffman decoding part of IJG with IPP function piDecodeHuffman8x8_Direct_JPEG_1u16s_C1,the decode speed is almost same as orginal IJG.
Can someone tell me where does the optimization performed in this function?And if erver compared with that of IJG?
0 Kudos

Link Copied

1 Reply
Vladimir_Dudnik
Employee
‎09-08-2005 03:02 PM
255 Views
We did not have IJG sample for Xscale, so we did not compare IJG with using IPP vs original. We are preparing IJG sample for IPP v5.0 for IXP on Linux big-endian, so I hope you'll find it useful. Preliminary the release is expected sometime at the end of this year.
Regards,
Vladimir
0 Kudos
Copy link
Reply

Community support is provided during standard business hours (Monday to Friday 7AM - 5PM PST). Other contact methods are available here.

Intel does not verify all solutions, including but not limited to any file transfers that may appear in this community. Accordingly, Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade.

For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice.