list of deprectated replacement functions

[sloos1]

Hello

Is there a list of deprecated functions (legacy 9.0) and the replacements in later versions, or strategy to work around if there is no 1:1 replacement? I just cant find anything.

Thank you

Stefan

[NoorjahanSk_Intel]

Hi,

 Thanks for reaching out to us.

>>Is there a list of deprecated functions

You can refer below links for details regarding deprecated legacy functions of IPP

https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/articles/intel-ipp-legacy-libraries.html

You can also refer below links for more details 

https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/ipp-dev-reference/top/volume-1-signal-and-data-processing/appendix-b-removed-functions-for-signal-processing.html

https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/documentation/ipp-crypto-reference/top/removed-functions.html

Apart from the information provided above, If you still have any queries related to this ,Please give us some more details on what kind of deprecated functions(domain specific if any) you are looking for in IPP and also provide the ipp version so that it will help us to answer your query.

Thanks & Regards

Noorjahan

[sloos1]

Hello Noorjahan

Thank you for help.

I indeed have now a query. 

But first a hint: in the documentation of WarpBilinearQuad, i read

Before using this function, compute the size of the external work buffer pBufferusing the WarpBilinearGetBufferSize function.

The link is obviously wrong, because you would need the coeffs that you dont get by 2 quads - WarpBilinearQuadGetBufferSize  is the function to go probably.

Now my issue: WarpPerspective was cancelled, all perspective trafos. Those trafo worked on a  [3][3] matrix of coefficents.

The new warpbilinear use [2][4] matrix coefficients. It is meant as replacment I suppose?

We have a lot of recipes with stored matrix coefficients in the form of perspective warp, using a [3][3] matrix for perspective transform.

Can you tell me whether there is a 1:1 replacement available currently or whether it can be transformed into a [2][4] matrix to get same result using warpbilinear?

Thanks & regards

Stefan

[sloos1]

Nevermind, I found proper function to use

[NoorjahanSk_Intel]

Hi,

Glad to know that you have resolved the issue.

As the issue is resolved can we close this thread from our end.

Thanks & Regards

Noorjahan

[NoorjahanSk_Intel]

Hi,

As the issue is resolved we will no longer monitor this thread.

If you need any additional information, please submit a new question as this thread will no longer be monitored.

Thanks & Regards

Noorjahan.