Intel® Quartus® Prime Software
Intel® Quartus® Prime Design Software, Design Entry, Synthesis, Simulation, Verification, Timing Analysis, System Design (Platform Designer, formerly Qsys)
16596 Discussions

Confusion about task vs NDRange implementaions

Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor II
933 Views

I'm attempting to implement a simple barrel shifter. I'm able to get it to work using a task based approach but am unable to do so using an NDRange based kernel. I've posted both kernels below. I'd appreciate some insight into how the implementation of the NDRange approach differs from the task. 

 

__kernel  

__attribute__((reqd_work_group_size(360,1,1))) 

__attribute__((max_work_group_size(360))) 

void barrelShifter_nd( 

__global unsigned char * restrict dataIn, 

const uint shift, 

__global unsigned char * restrict dataOut 

char __attribute((register)) din[720]; 

 

uint gid = get_global_id(0); 

 

din[gid] = dataIn[gid] & 0x1; 

din[360+gid] = dataIn[gid] & 0x1; 

 

 

dataOut[gid] = din[shift+gid]; 

 

}  

 

 

 

 

__kernel  

__attribute__((task))  

void barrelShifter_task( 

__global unsigned char * restrict dataIn, 

const uint shift, 

__global unsigned char * restrict dataOut 

char __attribute((register)) din[720]; 

 

for(uint i=0; i<360; i++) 

din = datain & 0x1; 

din[360+i] = dataIn & 0x1; 

 

# pragma unroll 

for(uint i=0; i<360; i++) 

dataout = din[shift+i]; 

 

}
0 Kudos
1 Reply
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor II
262 Views

It is not possible to infer shift registers of any type in NDRange kernels. As per OpenCL's specification, there is no guarantee of thread ordering in this kernel type, and local memory consistency is only guaranteed at barriers. It is not possible to describe a shift register in NDRange kernels, while conforming to both of these conditions.

0 Kudos
Reply