Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor I
733 Views

large number of small work-groups vs small number of large work-groups

Hello, 

I appreciate it if anyone can answer my question.  

I have a ND-range configuration, with 1 CU, and without SIMD (I mean a single PE in the single CU). Work-items access only to global memory (no local memory access).  

After some tests, I reach to this conclusion that for every CU, it is enough to have large number of work-items to have good performance, specifically, no matter that those work-items are organized in small number of large work-groups, or large number of small work-groups. In other words, there is only one pipeline in work-items level, and there is NO additional pipeline in work-group level. 

Is it right?
0 Kudos
1 Reply
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor I
28 Views

Yes, every CU only has one pipeline, and every work-item, regardless of which work-group it belongs to, goes through that pipeline. With one CU, if you are not using SIMD or local memory, the size of your work-group will not affect performance.

Reply