- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The timequest timing analyzer spend too much time(exceed 6hours) to report timing on one big hold violation path. I use quartusII/10.1sp1.
Anyone have similar experience on it? Thanks a lotLink Copied
2 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You mean you do something like:
report_timing -hold -npaths 1 -from/-to -panel_name "long_report" and it takes 6 hours to return? Or does that include the creation of the timing netlist, reading in the .sdc, etc.? Or is it the TQ time during a full compile? (None of that should take 6 hours, but just trying to understand)- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
On top of what Risc is asking, maybe you can give us additional information on the device family, type of design, etc.
Can you also tell us if TimeQuest reports a warning on combinational nodes? Combinational nodes require exponential time to analyze. 6hrs is not normal, so filing a case with http://mysupport.altera.com (ideally with the design) will help us debug it.
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page