- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If the choice of install directory isn't flexible enough in the installer, you can move the installed library directories as you choose. Then, if you use the compilervars or mklvars .bat files, you would need to edit them, but it seems that you depend only on Makefile settings.
The choice of Program Files (x86) has always been taken by Intel Software Tools installers on Windows X64. If you want to avoid that change when moving a Makefile from 32-bit to 64-bit Windows, it seems that moving the installation yourself might be an option.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello Adam,
You should be able to install several minor updates side-by-side.
The installer supposes to provide you an option, please see attached screenshot. If you do not have such screen installing next update, please let us know and we will investigate the problem.
http://software.intel.com/file/34259
The versioning problem you have described is a back side of the product bundling when the focus is moving from standalone to set of products. So it was a decision to remove standalone versions from install location.
Please let us brainstorm for a possible workaround for your framework.
Currently we are providing per component information in text files:
Could you reuse it? If NO, what version format is suitable for your framework?
Thank you,
- Nikolay
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page