Intel® oneAPI Math Kernel Library
Ask questions and share information with other developers who use Intel® Math Kernel Library.
공지
FPGA community forums and blogs have moved to the Altera Community. Existing Intel Community members can sign in with their current credentials.
7234 토론

run pardiso twice on same matrix = not same result

apocalx
초급자
830 조회수

I test case is attached to this message.I solve exactly the same matrix more than one time and I get different result.I can solve 10 times and get 8 times same result and 2 times another result. The next time, I get 6 times sames result and 4 times another result.Maybe you will need to run the case more than 1 time because sometime I get 10 time the same result.At each solve, it's a new surprise for me :)Here is a example result of X[2] whit 5 solve (fill matrix, facotrization and solve) :x[2] = 3.954994 +j 36.454584x[2] = 4.039025 +j 36.871752x[2] = 4.386890 +j 36.496321x[2] = 4.386890 +j 36.496321x[2] = 4.386890 +j 36.496321Marc

0 포인트
3 응답
Gennady_F_Intel
중재자
830 조회수
I just quickly checked the issue - I 've got the different numbers

x[2] = -0.220519 +j 26.730090
x[2] = -0.333848 +j 26.842847
x[2] = -0.220519 +j 26.730090
x[2] = -0.333848 +j 26.842847
x[2] = -0.220519 +j 26.730090
but the similar unrepeated results.
We will investigate the problem and back soon.
Did you check the condition number of this input?

--Gennady
0 포인트
styc
초급자
830 조회수

Element magnitudes of your matrix vary in a huge range. I saw ones as large as 5000000 and as small as 1e-7. Typically this is not a good sign for numerical stability.

EDIT: Well, it is worse than that. The matrix is singular. The last row is all zeros. Changing the bottom right element to 1 produces a matrix with a 2-condition number of 1.8e27.

0 포인트
Konstantin_A_Intel
830 조회수
Hi,

Indeed, if the matrix is singular (or highly ill-conditioned) than the solving process is highly unstable and, generally speaking, the result of computations is unpredictable.

Regards,
Konstantin
0 포인트
응답