- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm trying to find the "real world" coordinates (cm or mm) for certain well known objects/pixels in an image. I create pointclouds and try to get the coordinates by using the 'points.get_vertices()'.
It seems that the depth/z coordinate works perfectly, but not the x and y... If I for example mark two pixels that I know is 50 mm apart, they usually appear to be 80 mm apart. Does anyone know why this might be? The pointclouds themselves look good.
I use Python 2.7 on Windows 10 if that helps anything
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Back in March there was a case where someone was measuring the distance between two X-Y points that should have been 5 cm but was reading as 7 cm. An Intel support representative suggested using the 'Measure' sample program that comes with the RealSense SDK, and the user reported more accurate results when using Measure.
https://github.com/IntelRealSense/librealsense/issues/1413# issuecomment-375265310 deprojection pixels to 3d point · Issue # 1413 · IntelRealSense/librealsense · GitHub
https://github.com/IntelRealSense/librealsense/tree/master/examples/measure librealsense/examples/measure at master · IntelRealSense/librealsense · GitHub
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks, but using their method of calculating the 3d points didn't seem to help, I still get the same results (which i guess I'm supposed to get if I did things correctly before with my point cloud method?).
I can't run their c++ code right now because of reasons, but I translated the calculation into my python script.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Another point of reference other than the Measure sample is the Python example for measuring boxes. This example is compatible with use of multiple cameras.
https://github.com/IntelRealSense/librealsense/blob/master/wrappers/python/examples/box_dimensioner_multicam/box_dimensioner_multicam_demo.py librealsense/box_dimensioner_multicam_demo.py at master · IntelRealSense/librealsense · GitHub
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Could it simply be a matter of bad calibration? The difference in distance depend a bit on what angle the camera view the images from.
I previously thought that the factoty calibration was bad, so I recalibrated the realsense using the official tool, but that didn't seem to help.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
RealSense cameras are usually well-calibrated when bought. Reasons why a calibration might be needed include whether the camera receives a hard knock or a drop onto the floor.
We do not get many questions about XY accuracy, as the accuracy issues are usually related to Z-depth. You say that you have excellent depth accuracy in your readings though.
There is another recent discussion about measurement in Python in this discussion:
https://github.com/IntelRealSense/librealsense/issues/2343# issuecomment-418112374 histogram equalization · Issue # 2343 · IntelRealSense/librealsense · GitHub
Within that discussion, a Python tutorial called 'Distance to Object' is highlighted.
https://github.com/IntelRealSense/librealsense/blob/jupyter/notebooks/distance_to_object.ipynb librealsense/distance_to_object.ipynb at jupyter · IntelRealSense/librealsense · GitHub
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I seem to get much better results (perfect this far) when using the the intrinsic parameters from the color frame instead of the depth frame, and otherwise following the example in https://github.com/IntelRealSense/librealsense/tree/master/examples/measure librealsense/examples/measure at master · IntelRealSense/librealsense · GitHub .
For anyone else with the same problem, this is how I made a very simple distance function (assuming 'import numpy as np' and 'import pyrealsense2 as rs'):
def get_3d_coords(color_intr, depth_frame, xpix1, ypix1, xpix2, ypix2):
dist1 = depth_frame.get_distance(xpix1,ypix1)
dist2 = depth_frame.get_distance(xpix2,ypix2)
depth_point1 = rs.rs2_deproject_pixel_to_point(color_intr, [xpix1,ypix1], dist1)
depth_point2 = rs.rs2_deproject_pixel_to_point(color_intr, [xpix2,ypix2], dist2)
return np.sqrt(np.power(depth_point1[0] - depth_point2[0], 2) +
np.power(depth_point1[1] - depth_point2[1], 2) +
np.power(depth_point1[2] - depth_point2[2], 2))
I don't yet know if it's something that I just misunderstood the first time, or if it is connected to the fact that I align my depth and color image for a different part of my code. But this change of the intrinsic parameters also fixed my problem with the distance changing with viewing angle!
Thanks for all the very fast answers!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Awesome news that you found a solution - thanks so much for sharing your technique and code!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This was a bug which was supposed to have been fixed in 2.16; what version are you using?
https://github.com/IntelRealSense/librealsense/issues/2002 Aligned Point Cloud using wrong intrinsics? · Issue # 2002 · IntelRealSense/librealsense · GitHub
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
As far as I can see I have version 2.12, so that would be before the bug fix then.
![](/skins/images/1FC86CD46823E418D1E2B7B4DC10231C/responsive_peak/images/icon_anonymous_message.png)
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page