- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I am trying to migrate a golden system reference design (GSRD) for the Terasic DE0-Nano board that is based on a Nios II/e processor to another GSRD for the same board but based on a Nios V/m processor. I have used Quartus Prime Standard Edition 23.1 and Platform Designer for compiling the Nios V/m GSRD design.
I have been able to successfully execute a HelloWorld C program on a DE0-Nano board that was configured with a programming file obtained from compiling the Nios V/m GSRD.
However, I had to modify significantly the Nios II/e GSRD design in two ways:
1.- The SDRAM controller was removed because the IP Library of Platform Designer does not include such a controller. So, I used as main memory the on-chip (FPGA) SRAM memory (8 KB).
2.- Only one interrupt line of the "platform_irq_rx" port of the Nios V/m processor is allowed to be connected to a JTAG_UART controller. If more than one interrupt line were connected to the platform_irq_rx port, the "niosv-bsp -c -t=hal -s=nios_system.sopcinfo settings.bsp" command causes the following error: "BSP component drivers cannot specify mutually independent interrupt APIs. BSP not valid". The BSP was valid only if one interrupt line was connected to the Nios V/m processor. Platform Designer and Quartus compiled the GSRD design successfully when several interrupt lines were connected to the Nios V/m processor.
How could I connect more than one interrupt line to the Nios V/m interrupt controller without this error during the generation of settings.bsp BSP file.
Best regards.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
I understand the first interrupt line connected to the Nios V/m processor in your system is from "JTAT UART"?
For the second interrupt line, from which component in your system?
I wonder the issue is with the component you used in your system, but not the NiosV/m could not connect more interrupt line.
Best Regards,
Ann
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
Thank you very much for your question.
I think the issue is with the component.
When I connect both the JTAG UART and Interval_timer to the platform_irq_rx port of Nios V/m, there is no error during the generation of settings.bsp BSP file.
When the pushbuttons or one of the Expansion_JPx (x=1,2,3,3_in) controllers are connected to Nios V/m interrupt controller, the error is activated during the generation of settings.bsp BSP file.
Attached is the System Contents view of the Platform Designer tool for the GSRD on the DE0-Nano board when the error is produced in the case of only one interrupt line connected to the interrupt controller of Nios V/m.
Best regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
The component is “Parallel Port” under University Program and I wonder it is not in good status to support NiosV right now.
I would suggest you to replace them with the "PIO (Parallel I/O) Intel FPGA IP" and try it again to see if the error can be removed.
Best Regards,
Ann
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
The error was removed by replacing the “Parallel Port” under the University Program with the "PIO (Parallel I/O) Intel FPGA IP".
Thank you very much.
It would be nice if the "SDRAM controller IP" were available because the 32 MB of RAM memory available in the DE0-Nano board cannot be used. Anyway, some help to guide me in implementing such a memory controller is welcome.
Best regards,
Domingo
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello there,
Thank you for your understanding. Since your question pertains to a different domain compared to previous ones, I suggest opening a new case where domain experts can assist you more effectively. I will go ahead and close the current case.
Thank you once again for your understanding!
Best regards,
WZ

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page