Nios® V/II Embedded Design Suite (EDS)
Support for Embedded Development Tools, Processors (SoCs and Nios® V/II processor), Embedded Development Suites (EDSs), Boot and Configuration, Operating Systems, C and C++
Announcements
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.
12748 Discussions

lan91c111 component(v7.2) in Nios2 not supported by uclinux??

Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor II
1,181 Views

Hi everyone, I am working on running uclinux(newest in the wiki) on nios2 using StratixII Dev board(2s60 with two ADC&DACs on it), I use QII(edk) 7.2. But when I add lan91c111 interface of version7.2 in sopc bulder, after generation there comes out a new "address_to_the_lan91c111[15..0]" port which doesn't exist if I add a version7.0 lan91c111 interface IP. And the other ports(data,rd,wt..) are the same as version7.0 case, then I don not care about new 16bits port(link nothing), after I recompile and run the uclinux, the device driver can not start the smc91c111 ethernet chip, as the start script say:"smc91x: not found (-19)." If I use version7.0 lan91c111 component, the device driver can boot up the chip successfully. So, is the device driver is "too old" to support the version7.2 lan91c111? If I want the lan91c1x driver in uclinux support the 7.2, whant should I do? Even now, 7.0 could some kind work well, that's good. 

 

Any advice or recommendation is appriated.:)
0 Kudos
1 Reply
Altera_Forum
Honored Contributor II
460 Views

oh, I have fixed this problem, it's not the driver or the version, but I didn't configue the sram-ethernet share in the tri-avalon-bus which link the sram and lan91c111. I guess it's because we didn't share the address, so it display in the generated file(.bdf) for you could use it directly. 

Thanks for consideration.:)
0 Kudos
Reply