Re: why software's speed is so slowly run on nios II

Altera_Forum · ‎07-01-2005

hi!

I write a software programm run on the nios II ,but the speed is slowly when it is running on the nios II. I use the singalTap catch the singal to analyse the speed ,I found when I add a equal ,like as:

a=3;

the speed will increase about 5 clock'time,The Nios II is 50MHz,

I feel that the speed shoud't so slowly,but I can't find the reason.so I want to get some advise from you.

thanks.

Altera_Forum · ‎07-19-2005

Hi gerger,

What kind of Nios II core type?? if you have used Nios II e-version, change Nios II core type to Nios II f-version.

Regards.

Altera_Forum · ‎07-20-2005

Hello Gerger,

What is your code optimization set to in the properties for you project?

Try using optimization -O3 this may help!

Good Luck!

Altera_Forum · ‎07-21-2005

yes ,I have use the NIos II f_version and g _o3,there are a little progress,but the speed is not very highly increase

Altera_Forum · ‎07-23-2005

A statement like a=3 takes one cycle to execute on the Nios II/f assuming the instruction is in the cache.

Are you familiar with the operation of caches? Also, what signals are you observing in signaltap to see the

instructions flow down the pipeline? If you only look at the Avalon instruction master, you'll only see instruction

cache line fills, not instruction execution.

If you post more of your program (maybe a portion of the hot loop), we can give you more information.

Altera_Forum · ‎07-27-2005

hello,my code is like this

word1=1;

word2=2;

word3=3;

word4=4;

word5=5;

//from this

check_sum=(word1&0x0000ffff)+(word1>>16)

+(word2&0x0000ffff)+(word2>>16)

+(word3&0x0000ffff)+(word3>>16)

+(word4&0x0000ffff)+(word4>>16)

(word5&0x0000ffff)+(word5>>16);

while(check_sum>>16)

check_sum=(check_sum&0x0000ffff)+(check_sum>>16);

if(check_sum==0x0000ffff)

errflag=0;

else

errflag=1;

//end this

I had found do check_sum need about 100 cycles with Nios/f and _g3 .is it true ?

In addition £¬if a=3,the data isn't in cache ,how many cycles will spend?

Altera_Forum · ‎07-27-2005

100 cycles sounds fine to me. If you do a checksum in hardware it will be 'n' cycles, with 'n' being the width. Like James said before data cache can play a big role in the calculation time. I recommend you take a look at the Nios II documentation since the cycle time of each instruction is listed in the hardware documentation.

Altera_Forum · ‎07-28-2005

thanks£¡

->100 cycles sounds fine to me. it sounds the speed is normally.before your replied,I had thought that my code was wrong in somewhere to result these .

I had done the check_sum with custom_instruction of NIos II ,but the LE is not so much .so I had to do the check _sum with software .if did the check_sum with hardware ,the cycle is about 10 cycls .