- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3610QM CPU @ 2.30GHz; OpenCL 1.2 (Build 76427)
warning: HEAP[gpuowl.exe]:
warning: Invalid address specified to RtlFreeHeap( 0000000002B30000, 000000000D645B00 )
Thread 1 "gpuowl" received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.
0x00007ffd8056c4cf in ntdll!RtlpNtMakeTemporaryKey () from /c/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/ntdll.dll
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffd8056c4cf in ntdll!RtlpNtMakeTemporaryKey () from /c/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/ntdll.dll
#1 0x00007ffd8053829a in ntdll!memset () from /c/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/ntdll.dll
#2 0x00007ffd80503d01 in ntdll!EtwEventProviderEnabled () from /c/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/ntdll.dll
#3 0x00007ffd8052df51 in ntdll!memset () from /c/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/ntdll.dll
#4 0x00007ffd804acfb6 in ntdll!RtlFreeHeap () from /c/WINDOWS/SYSTEM32/ntdll.dll
#5 0x00007ffd69a154c8 in intelocl64!clGetExtensionFunctionAddressForPlatform ()
from /c/Program Files (x86)/Common Files/Intel/OpenCL/bin/x64/intelocl64.dll
#6 0x00007ffd699dd32a in intelocl64!clGetExtensionFunctionAddressForPlatform ()
from /c/Program Files (x86)/Common Files/Intel/OpenCL/bin/x64/intelocl64.dll
#7 0x00007ffd699d2e02 in intelocl64!clGetExtensionFunctionAddressForPlatform ()
from /c/Program Files (x86)/Common Files/Intel/OpenCL/bin/x64/intelocl64.dll
#8 0x00007ffd699c6546 in intelocl64!clGetExtensionFunctionAddressForPlatform ()
from /c/Program Files (x86)/Common Files/Intel/OpenCL/bin/x64/intelocl64.dll
#9 0x00007ffd699b39f3 in intelocl64!clBuildProgram () from /c/Program Files (x86)/Common Files/Intel/OpenCL/bin/x64/intelocl64.dll
#10 0x00000001004019ec in compile (device=0x2b37770, context=0x2b38ec0, fileName=0x100407858 "gpuowl.cl",
opts=0x100407072 "") at clwrap.h:117
#11 0x0000000100404509 in main (argc=3, argv=0xffffcc10) at gpuowl.cpp:543
Link Copied
2 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sorry for the delay getting back to you.
Is this the gpuOwl project you're testing against? https://github.com/preda/gpuowl
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, although the line numbers in gpuowl.cpp may not match exactly because I added a few debug printf()s.

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page