Programmable Devices
CPLDs, FPGAs, SoC FPGAs, Configuration, and Transceivers
20892 Discussions

10M08SCE144C8G Temperature Issues

2reSolve
Novice
614 Views

Hi,

 

We're having some wird temperature issues with some newer 10M08SCE144C8G FPGA chips date marked with "2301A".

 

The FPGA chips are used in an older MUX design "which have always worked before".

 

Some of the "2301A" chips, however, does not operate as normal at 25C room temperature. However, if we apply external heating they suddenly start working as normal at arond 35-50C.

Looking at some of our older circuits boards without temperature problems, with FPGA chips date marked "2007A", I cannot help notice the text painted in white color is very easy to read:

Old, working FPGA. Please notice clear, white text.Old, working FPGA. Please notice clear, white text.

Compared to examining the newer "2301A" boards, the one with temperature problems, the text is almost impossible to read, like the white paint inside the text is completely missing:

Newer, failed FPGA. Is the more unclear text a sign of soldering heat damage?Newer, failed FPGA. Is the more unclear text a sign of soldering heat damage?

What's the most possible explonation:

1. The FPGA has been mounted using the wrong soldering profile with to high temperature

2. Intel has simply removed the white paint from its Altera MAX 10 chips. Nothing to worry about.

3. These are fake, chineese duplicates (and yes, these boards have been assembled in China).

 

Please advice.

Labels (1)
11 Replies
matvr
Beginner
552 Views

Hi @2reSolve !

 

Since you're switching from old "2007A" to recently manufactured "2301A" do you use the same binary for newer device which you have used for the older one? When was it compiled?

I think you might also want to explain a little bit what you exactly mean by "does not operate as normal at 25C room temperature" since it may raise further thoughts on what might be going wrong in your case.

 

BR, Matt

0 Kudos
2reSolve
Novice
538 Views

Thanks for this input Matt.

 

1. We will investigate this Errata carfully.

2. Yes, same binary was used. The .pof compile date is 2016-06-07. We will look into re-compiling the project.

3. Sorry. The FPGA does not work at all at 20-25C room temperature. But this only appy to about 1/3 of the  2301 dated FPGA units.

 

We don't think the FPGA parts are fake, but we can't know 100% for sure they are not re-purposed/used parts.

 

The firmware for these FPGA's was originally designed by an external consultant (as we lack in-house FPGA expertice).

Sadly, this consultant is no longer available so we are now in contact with some other consultants to solve this.

0 Kudos
matvr
Beginner
528 Views

1. For the Errata - I removed suggestion from previous post since I wrongly decoded the 2007 date code. It is never a bad thing to double check the issues from errata, though.

 

2. For the binary I would suggest to try recompile the project since it is possible for adjustments in silicon production to affect timings of the FPGA and thus lead to some issues, for instance. Synthesiser should be able to fix this if it is indeed the case.

 

3. Do you test the boards through all the product temperature range? For 33% not working could be some margin effects like capacitance change with temperature and not related to the FPGA at all.

 

Still don't understand what do you mean by "FPGA does not work at all at 20-25C room temperature".
For me it appears as if what you really mean by this is "FPGA doesn't fulfil the function that it is supposed to". But it doesn't mean that it does not work at all - the FPGA itself might be configured (let's call it "firmware running"), PLL generating clocks, input data handling but it could be at some dead end of the algorithm due to wrong timings, for instance.

 

BR, Matt.

0 Kudos
FvM
Valued Contributor III
509 Views
Hi,
seeing the problem with several boards suggests a systematic effect, e.g. a design timing failure. The reason why it reveals with newer chips can be that they are faster due to technology improvements. Raising temperature reduces chip speed.

First steps would be to characterize observed function failure in detail and to have an expert reviewing the original design for possible timing constraint vacancies and other trap doors.
0 Kudos
FvM
Valued Contributor III
464 Views
Forgot to mention that there can be also board hardware related issues, power supply voltage out of range or illegal logic level of relevant input signals so that the design is only working by chance.
0 Kudos
2reSolve
Novice
431 Views

Yes, your assumtion is probably the correct one.

We have already reached out to an expert which will review the original design and simulate its timing constraints.

0 Kudos
2reSolve
Novice
431 Views

1. OK

2. We will hire an external FPGA consultant which will recompile the project and perform the necessary simulation and design verification and testing at different temperatures.

3. No, unfortunetly we currently do not. So, as per now, we only know that 33% of these boards fails their function test at 20-25C room temperature. If we were to lower the temperature below room temperature, we would expect an even higher persentage. We Will look into the capacitor issue.

 

Sorry about the unclear langue. And yes, I really mean "The FPGA doesn't fulfil its function at room temperature (and below)".

0 Kudos
NazrulNaim_Intel
Employee
443 Views

Hello,

Good day

 

Thank you for reaching out. I'm Nazrul Naim looking into your issue and allow me some time to look into your issue. I shall come back to you with findings.

 

Thank you for your patience.

 

Best Regards,

Nazrul Naim


0 Kudos
2reSolve
Novice
378 Views

Hello Naim,

 

Thanks for your attantion on this issue. Any info you may share which would help resolve this issue will be greatly appreciated.

 

Meanwhile, as per FvM suggestions, we will have an FPGA expert characterize and observe the function failure in detail, review the original design for possible timing constraint vacancies and other trap doors. Hopefully this will bring a solution to our problems.

 

Best, Tore

0 Kudos
NazrulNaim_Intel
Employee
213 Views

Hi Tore,


I'm sorry for the delay. I understand your concern however, sorry to let you know that we do not provide part marking verification in order to avoid the devices from grey market.

 

Altera has its authorized distributor to sale devices. If you got the devices from formal distributors, you shouldn’t worry on the device authenticity/validity as the devices must be valid units. Otherwise, we do not ensure the device quality and do not provide the further service. You may find the authorized distributor list from the link below:

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/programmable/buy.html

 

Regards,

Nazrul Naim


0 Kudos
NazrulNaim_Intel
Employee
101 Views

Hello,

 

As we do not receive any response from you on the previous question/reply/answer that we have provided. Please login to ‘https://supporttickets.intel.com’, view details of the desire request, and post a feed/response within the next 15 days to allow me to continue to support you. After 15 days, this thread will be transitioned to community support. The community users will be able to help you on your follow-up questions.

 

Best regards,

Nazrul Naim


0 Kudos
Reply