- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
HI,
I have an architecture with: - cyclon iv ep4ce6e22c8n with a programming chip epc64n it is a new release of an old schematic working fine, just the PCB was changed. I am able to load with byteblaster the programming chip but the fpga does not start. is the some one ableto help me? than you in advance, please find attached the photos of signal and schematicLink Copied
6 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Why are you using 1K pullups to VCC (+3.3V?) on CONF_DONE, nCONFIG, and nSTATUS signals? Altera recommendation is 10K.
1K pulldown on nCE should be OK. "it is a new release of an old schematic working fine, just the PCB was changed." ... it could also then be poor layout practices on the associated signals (DCLK, etc).- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- Why are you using 1K pullups to VCC (+3.3V?) on CONF_DONE, nCONFIG, and nSTATUS signals? Altera recommendation is 10K. 1K pulldown on nCE should be OK. "it is a new release of an old schematic working fine, just the PCB was changed." ... it could also then be poor layout practices on the associated signals (DCLK, etc). --- Quote End --- HI thank you for the answer, I will ty thank you maurizio
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
HI,
I changed the pull-up and down with 10Kohm resistor. nothing is changed. please let me suggest more mauriio stefani- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- HI, I changed the pull-up and down with 10Kohm resistor. nothing is changed. please let me suggest more mauriio stefani --- Quote End --- What about the MSEL[2:0] lines? You show both a 4.7K pullup to VCC and a pulldown to GND on each line. Obviously only one resistor of the pair should be populated per line. So what is the resistor stuffing selection on your MSEL[2:0] lines? For AS at 3.3V MSEL[2:0] should be either hi/lo/hi or lo/hi/lo depending on fast or standard POR.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
HI,
thank you for reply, the MSEL lines are wired to value of 2, means R42 mounted with value of "0" ohm, R39 mounted with value of "0" ohm, R30 mounted @0hm, R41, R29 and R40 are absent-. thank you, please help with any other suggestions thank you maurizio stefani- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- HI, thank you for reply, the MSEL lines are wired to value of 2, means R42 mounted with value of "0" ohm, R39 mounted with value of "0" ohm, R30 mounted @0hm, R41, R29 and R40 are absent-. thank you, please help with any other suggestions thank you maurizio stefani --- Quote End --- That should work. I would then check that the power supply power up meets the FPGA specs (ie, power supply sequencing, ramp rates are as required). I would also check for any unintended PCB solder shorts on the FPGA device. Do you have another board, and if so does it behave identically? Your signal waveforms as shown in your first post show a substantial amount of noise. It could be real, or it could be due to how your probes are attached. It would be interesting to see the DCLK and DATA waveforms at a more expanded scale (ie, higher horizontal resolution).

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page