Software Tuning, Performance Optimization & Platform Monitoring
Discussion regarding monitoring and software tuning methodologies, Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU) of Intel microprocessors, and platform updating.
1740 Discussions

Performance of YASK with different snoop configuration modes on Xeons

Michael_T_
Beginner
‎07-12-2017 04:38 AM
706 Views

I was wondering how does performance of the YASK stencil benchmarks varies based on different snoop configuration modes for Haswells or Broadwells ? Early-snoop, vs Home-snoop vs Cluster-onDie ?

Thanks,

Michael

0 Kudos

Link Copied

1 Reply
McCalpinJohn
Honored Contributor III
‎07-12-2017 06:00 AM
706 Views

I have not run these benchmarks, but most stencil operations are bandwidth-limited, so they will benefit from the higher bandwidth of "Home Snoop" vs "Early Snoop".  If the implementation is NUMA-friendly, then "cluster-on-die" should provide an additional benefit.

The local bandwidth difference between "Home Snoop" and "Early Snoop" is not large, but there is a very big difference in remote bandwidth on  the systems I have tested (mostly Xeon E5 v3 "Haswell EP").    The attached chart shows results I obtained using the Intel Memory Latency Checker on a 2-socket Xeon E5-2660 v3 system --- NOTE that these are REMOTE bandwidth numbers only -- the local bandwidth numbers are much, much closer.

HSW-EP_RemoteBW-vs-SnoopMode_v2.png

0 Kudos
Copy link
Reply

Community support is provided Monday to Friday. Other contact methods are available here.

Intel does not verify all solutions, including but not limited to any file transfers that may appear in this community. Accordingly, Intel disclaims all express and implied warranties, including without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement, as well as any warranty arising from course of performance, course of dealing, or usage in trade.

For more complete information about compiler optimizations, see our Optimization Notice.