- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- Avoid BDF editor like the plague. --- Quote End --- Why?:blink: Some people say, that is BSM level is the only way out: http://www.alteraforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3779&p=162131#post162131 (http://www.alteraforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3779&p=162131#post162131)
Link Copied
6 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
So, can Anyone say anything with facts against using BDF editor?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Not really. I say use the tools you feel comfortable with.
It's just that in my opinion it feels easier to use at the beginning, but as your design gets more complicated it resembles more and more like a plate of spaghetti and becomes near to impossible to debug properly. If you find reading someone else's code difficult, try to read someone else's design entirely done with the graphical editor, spread over 4-5 A3 sheets... real life experience! :shock: And after 2/3 times of SOPC Builder / QSys messing your symbol completely even for a tiny change, you will be cured and will use HDL, like everyone else ;)- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Also to add:
- you cannot directly simulate graphical files, you need to export them to hdl (then you get into the problem of "what to I check into my version control system". You check both in, and you risk having the two missmatch each other because on the last checking you forgot to export the bdf again). - they are not parameterisable at a connection level (HDL is) -You can only open them in Altera tools -You get called bad names by all the other engineers.- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
And I forgot:
The BDF editor in quartus 10+ is really really cr ap. compared to version 9 and before. Its like they're really trying to stop people using it.- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- Not really. I say use the tools you feel comfortable with. It's just that in my opinion it feels easier to use at the beginning, but as your design gets more complicated it resembles more and more like a plate of spaghetti and becomes near to impossible to debug properly. If you find reading someone else's code difficult, try to read someone else's design entirely done with the graphical editor, spread over 4-5 A3 sheets... real life experience! :shock: And after 2/3 times of SOPC Builder / QSys messing your symbol completely even for a tiny change, you will be cured and will use HDL, like everyone else ;) --- Quote End --- Topics like this about BDF and like this about QSys ( http://www.alteraforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=35671 ) are very discouraging about Altera GUI... According to Your experience - what Altera GUI is less buggy in Quartus 12.1sp1: BDF Editor or QSys?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
BDF editor and Qsys are different things.
Basically they dont want you to use the BDF editor if you can avoid it.
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page