- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @CheePin_C_Intel ,
I am using stratix 10 development kit,
From transceiver user guide:
A.4.7. Embedded Streamer (Native PHY) and
A.1.4. Embedded Streamer (ATX PLL)
Shares common register space for embedded streamer. for changing profile.
And PreSICE have common register space.
So do they have common register space for other configurations too ? like loopback mode change.
In my project i have to use dynamic reconfiguration for both ATX PLL and PHY.
as it is READ MODIFIED WRITE, with respect to which avmm_wait_request i can access the register data !
I am confused over its architecture,
1) same AVMM bus can be connected to ATX PLL and NATIVE PHY ?
or
2) to modify loopback modes Native PHY,AVMM Bus should be different,
for any change in ATX PLL different AVMM BUS ?
Please see the attached snapshot, and share which architecture is correct
hope i will get clarity over this.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
As I understand it, you have some inquiries related to the reconfiguration interfaces for ATX PLL and Native PHY. For your information, each of the IP has its own reconfiguration interface. Although the address value is similar i.e. 0x540 but they are two different address registers inside the device. You controller would need to connect and control them separately like case #2 in your sketch. Hope this clarify.
Please let me know if there is any concern. Thank you.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
As I understand it, you have some inquiries related to the reconfiguration interfaces for ATX PLL and Native PHY. For your information, each of the IP has its own reconfiguration interface. Although the address value is similar i.e. 0x540 but they are two different address registers inside the device. You controller would need to connect and control them separately like case #2 in your sketch. Hope this clarify.
Please let me know if there is any concern. Thank you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for your update. Glad that it helps.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I believe the initial inquiry has been addressed. This thread will be transitioned to community support. If you have a new question, feel free to open a new thread to get the support from Intel experts. Otherwise, the community users will continue to help you on this thread. Thank you.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page