FPGA, SoC, And CPLD Boards And Kits
FPGA Evaluation and Development Kits
6150 Discussions

[SOLVED] Can I use single port ram and be able to use the memory in the immediate next cycle?

zangman
New Contributor I
484 Views

EDIT: Apologies, I'm an idiot. I just realized that the reason for the clock delay is because I'm using a register to store the address of the memory in another module. That's why it's taking one extra cycle. Effectively, my design is doing:

  • clock-cycle 0: Store 42 in A-register on posedge of clk.
  • clock-cycle 1: NOP - This allows the memory to use the new address value from the A-register.
  • clock-cycle 2: Memory now points to the address from A-register. Use the value from the RAM.

So my problem is not really with the way the RAM is designed. It's with the fact that that I can only access memory location using the address register.

ORIGINAL QUESTION BELOW:

When using a Single clock single port synchronous RAM, it appears that the data that I store in memory won't be available to read at least until one clock cycle later.

What I want to be able to do is:

  • clock-cycle 0: Store 42 in memory address 24.
  • clock-cycle 1: Retrieve 42 from memory address 24.

But when I use the code below, I end up having to do:

  • clock-cycle 0: Store 42 in memory address 24.
  • clock-cycle 1: NOP
  • clock-cycle 2: Retrieve 42 from memory address 24.

If I use an asynchronous single port RAM, it works as expected but I can't utilise the block ram on my FPGA.

My question is - Is this expected, or am I doing something wrong? If this is expected, is there any way to have the code be synthesized to BRAM while being able to access it immediately after?

The code I'm using is identical to the one on this page.

 

 

module ram_infer
(
	input [7:0] data,
	input [5:0] read_addr, write_addr,
	input we, clk,
	output reg [7:0] q
);

	// Declare the RAM variable
	reg [7:0] ram[63:0];

	always @ (posedge clk)
	begin		
		if (we)
			ram[write_addr] <= data;
		q <= ram[read_addr];
	end

endmodule

 

 

0 Kudos
0 Replies
Reply