- 新着としてマーク
- ブックマーク
- 購読
- ミュート
- RSS フィードを購読する
- ハイライト
- 印刷
- 不適切なコンテンツを報告
Here's an arguably better development environment:
http://www.ddci.com/products_SCORE.php?t=PC/Windows
Perhaps a marketing arrangement could be made if suitable. It provides its own run time environment for Windows (and many other platforms that it targets).
http://www.ddci.com/products_SCORE.php?t=PC/Windows
Perhaps a marketing arrangement could be made if suitable. It provides its own run time environment for Windows (and many other platforms that it targets).
コピーされたリンク
2 返答(返信)
- 新着としてマーク
- ブックマーク
- 購読
- ミュート
- RSS フィードを購読する
- ハイライト
- 印刷
- 不適切なコンテンツを報告
If all you want is a development environment, there's also Eclipse/Photran. In our market, though, interoperability with MSVC is a requirement.
- 新着としてマーク
- ブックマーク
- 購読
- ミュート
- RSS フィードを購読する
- ハイライト
- 印刷
- 不適切なコンテンツを報告
I was thinking about expanding the market, not contracting it.
Compatibility with MSVC can be maintained. This particular
development environment plus compiler set can produce object code for
many different processors, including various embedded processors.
Each language produces a common intermediate format (ANDF). I
wouldn't dream of harming the existing market, "simply" add an
optional conversion from any current intermediate language to
ANDF. Compatibility with MSVC is mostly about argument passing
mechanisms. You already provide virtually every conceivable
option for adjusting argument passing mechanisms. I don't see it
to be an unsolvable problem. I would view this as a home-run,
winning combination.
