- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Here's an arguably better development environment:
http://www.ddci.com/products_SCORE.php?t=PC/Windows
Perhaps a marketing arrangement could be made if suitable. It provides its own run time environment for Windows (and many other platforms that it targets).
http://www.ddci.com/products_SCORE.php?t=PC/Windows
Perhaps a marketing arrangement could be made if suitable. It provides its own run time environment for Windows (and many other platforms that it targets).
Link Copied
2 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If all you want is a development environment, there's also Eclipse/Photran. In our market, though, interoperability with MSVC is a requirement.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I was thinking about expanding the market, not contracting it.
Compatibility with MSVC can be maintained. This particular
development environment plus compiler set can produce object code for
many different processors, including various embedded processors.
Each language produces a common intermediate format (ANDF). I
wouldn't dream of harming the existing market, "simply" add an
optional conversion from any current intermediate language to
ANDF. Compatibility with MSVC is mostly about argument passing
mechanisms. You already provide virtually every conceivable
option for adjusting argument passing mechanisms. I don't see it
to be an unsolvable problem. I would view this as a home-run,
winning combination.

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page