- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The following is noted as an obsolescent statement (i.e. Standard 95 checking) by all the compilers (CVF 6.6B, 6.6C, and IVF 8):
CHARACTER*30 String
but this is missed by all the compilers:
CHARACTER String*30
(I assume the previous declaration is not a legal Standard 95 declaration or is it?)
Linda
Link Copied
3 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The latter is legal and not obsolescent, so the compilers are behaving correctly here.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Well, that would explain why it didn't complain.
Will the actual release of 6.6C come soon -- will it be any different than your last link?
Linda
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The link I posted as 6.6C3 is final. My understanding is that the HP web pages are being updated to reference it.

Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page