- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
1 | -1.6 | 0.79588 |
2 | 20 | 1.30103 |
3 | 53 | 1.724276 |
4 | 102 | 2.0086 |
5 | 300 | 2.477121 |
Jim:
Table is five equally spaced locations so integers are ok, next column is stress in MPa and next column is log. (See below about the 0.975 )
I have a steel block and we see strains and stresses, that vary with the daily temperature - this is about 25 days
I was asked why
It turns out the manufacture of the block and the rest of the stuff probably allows a rocking mechanism with temperature, the peak stress point migrates back and forward across the block as the bridge warms and we measure strain at one location on the side. A simple FEM model shows the expected result. The strain gauge on the other side failed, so if we averaged we would be ok.
I have estimated the stress in MPA at the five locations across the top for the point load and get a nice set of numbers, if I plot them I get
simple fourth order equation, the lowest number is -1.6
If I take the log of the last four numbers I get
So -1.6 plots as 0.8.
If I take 0.8 from 1 I get 0.2 and that is log of 1.6. Anything below the one line is negative log calculator so to speak. It breaks down pretty quickly
Thoughts, PS this is just for fun.
John
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
John,
A lot is not said about your setup.
The object under test... you state you have a steel block. Where do you place your strain gauges? On the side that faces the sun?, shade side?.. Is the block painted?
If in your second chart (blue and orange dots), I assume time is your X axis, and Y reflects a factor of strain. I count ~21 cycles.
It may help you understand what is going on, had you had temperature sensors (of steel) in proximity of the strain gauges. Also to have a measurement of solar radiation in proximity of the strain gauges. As well as ambient temperature indicated on chart.
I find three things of interest:
- The slope up is (generally) not as steep as the slope down.
- There tends to be a jiggle (1) on the slopes up
- There is a change in slope up (2)
Why?
Are there other external factors that might affect thermal radiation? e.g. shadow from trees, road sign, buildings, window reflections from buildings, traffic, ...?
Jim

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page