- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi, I'm working on building mapping matrix between 2 meshes
Elements of mapping matrix is just a portion of intersecting volume of the mesh elements.
So, if the elements of mesh1 contain velocity info, velocity of the elements in mesh2 can be calculated by matrix-vector product
v2 = M1*v1 ( also, v1 = M2*v2)
As the number of elements of the meshes are very large, I want to apply openMP to parallelize the algorithm.
Here is my pseudo code
module tmp
use mMesh
use mIntersect
use mCSR
implicit none
integer :: n1, n2
type(CSR) :: M1, M2
contains
subroutine Set(No1, No2)
integer, intent(in) :: No1, No2
n1 = No1; n2 = No2
end subroutine Set
subroutine Map(mesh1, mesh2)
type(mesh), intent(in) :: mesh1, mesh2
integer :: i, j
integer :: icount1, icount2
real(8) :: Vol
type(compCSR) :: comp
type(listCSR), dimension(n2), target :: heads1
type(listCSR), dimension(n1), target :: heads2
!$OMP Parallel default(private) shared(icount1,icount2,heads1,heads2)
!$OMP DO
icount1 = 0; icount2 = 0
do i = 1, n1
do j = 1, n2
Vol = IntersectVolume(mesh1%Ele(i), mesh2%Ele(j))
if (Vol.GT.0.d0) then
comp%col = i; comp%val = Vol/mesh2%EleVol(j)
call Insert(comp, heads1(j))
icount1 = icount1 + 1
comp%col = j; comp%val = Vol/mesh1%EleVol(i)
call Insert(comp, heads2(i))
icount2 = icount2 + 1
end if
end do
end do
!$OMP END DO
!$OMP END Parallel
call MakeCSR(icount1, heads1, M1)
call MakeCSR(icount2, heads2, M2)
end subroutine Map
end module tmp
program test
use tmp
use mMesh
implicit none
character(len=80) :: file1='mesh1.dat'
character(len=80) :: file2='mesh2.dat'
type(mesh) :: mesh1, mesh2
call ReadMesh(file1, mesh1)
call ReadMesh(file2, mesh2)
call Set(mesh1%nele, mesh2%nele)
call Map(mesh1, mesh2)
end program test
As the mapping matrix is sparse matrix, I used CSR format to store mapping matrix.
'module mCSR' is the module that I made to use CSR arrays
'heads1, heads2' are array of linked list to build CSR arrays
( from topic https://software.intel.com/en-us/comment/1918497# (several routines are modified))
I want to parallelize the loop 'i' and 'icount1, icount2, heads1, head2' should be shared to make CSR array after the loop.
But the above OMP method didn't work...
Is there any idea to make that possible...?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sharing a variable in a parallel region that each thread performs (as an example)
icount1 = icount1 + 1
exhibits a race condition amongst threads (you may lose counts). To correct for counting-like race conditions, use the OpenMP reduction clause.
The $OMP DO must immediately precede the Fortran DO (place icount's initialiation before the $OMP parallel .AND. use the reduction clause on those variables (I will let you read up on and investigate reduction as an exercize).
An additional issue you have here, more subtle, is
While the second Insert using heads2(i) will be thread-safe, due to each thread having different i index, the first Insert using heads1(j) will have potential collisions with different threads using the same j.
I will let you think about how to fix that (be creative).
Jim Dempsey
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Sharing a variable in a parallel region that each thread performs (as an example)
icount1 = icount1 + 1
exhibits a race condition amongst threads (you may lose counts). To correct for counting-like race conditions, use the OpenMP reduction clause.
The $OMP DO must immediately precede the Fortran DO (place icount's initialiation before the $OMP parallel .AND. use the reduction clause on those variables (I will let you read up on and investigate reduction as an exercize).
An additional issue you have here, more subtle, is
While the second Insert using heads2(i) will be thread-safe, due to each thread having different i index, the first Insert using heads1(j) will have potential collisions with different threads using the same j.
I will let you think about how to fix that (be creative).
Jim Dempsey
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page