- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I just update my Ubuntu to 9.04. and I'm getting message after
./t62
./t62: error while loading shared libraries: libiomp5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
no errors during compilation(ifort -openmp -o t62 t62.f90)
I'm using 11.0 / 074
libiomp5.so seems to be in directory /opt/intel/Compiler/11.0/074/lib/intel64
./t62
./t62: error while loading shared libraries: libiomp5.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
no errors during compilation(ifort -openmp -o t62 t62.f90)
I'm using 11.0 / 074
libiomp5.so seems to be in directory /opt/intel/Compiler/11.0/074/lib/intel64
Link Copied
7 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH (recommended way is by source /opt/intel/Compiler/11.0/074/bin/ifortvars.sh,
same as when compiling).
Maybe you have an old fixed path in your setup.
same as when compiling).
Maybe you have an old fixed path in your setup.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - tim18
Did you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH (recommended way is by source /opt/intel/Compiler/11.0/074/bin/ifortvars.sh,
same as when compiling).
Maybe you have an old fixed path in your setup.
same as when compiling).
Maybe you have an old fixed path in your setup.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - tim18
Did you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH (recommended way is by source /opt/intel/Compiler/11.0/074/bin/ifortvars.sh,
same as when compiling).
Maybe you have an old fixed path in your setup.
same as when compiling).
Maybe you have an old fixed path in your setup.
Secondly. If I upgraded OS, does it mean that all my libraries were connected to the old core?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - lessonfree
It works until I restart the computer. How to make it permanent?
Secondly. If I upgraded OS, does it mean that all my libraries were connected to the old core?
Secondly. If I upgraded OS, does it mean that all my libraries were connected to the old core?
If you used another mechanism, such as ldconfig, it very likely got changed without recognizing Intel software in the OS upgrade. You would have to update it with the current Intel library directory. I suppose it's easy to get messed up with software upgrades if using ldconfig.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - tim18
Maybe you had the source command for the compiler in a login script, such as .profile. Such things might be disturbed with the upgrade. If you upgraded the compiler, you may have several versions installed; if you were pointing to an older version of the shared libraries at run time, it may have worked up to a point.
If you used another mechanism, such as ldconfig, it very likely got changed without recognizing Intel software in the OS upgrade. You would have to update it with the current Intel library directory. I suppose it's easy to get messed up with software upgrades if using ldconfig.
If you used another mechanism, such as ldconfig, it very likely got changed without recognizing Intel software in the OS upgrade. You would have to update it with the current Intel library directory. I suppose it's easy to get messed up with software upgrades if using ldconfig.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - tim18
Maybe you had the source command for the compiler in a login script, such as .profile. Such things might be disturbed with the upgrade. If you upgraded the compiler, you may have several versions installed; if you were pointing to an older version of the shared libraries at run time, it may have worked up to a point.
If you used another mechanism, such as ldconfig, it very likely got changed without recognizing Intel software in the OS upgrade. You would have to update it with the current Intel library directory. I suppose it's easy to get messed up with software upgrades if using ldconfig.
If you used another mechanism, such as ldconfig, it very likely got changed without recognizing Intel software in the OS upgrade. You would have to update it with the current Intel library directory. I suppose it's easy to get messed up with software upgrades if using ldconfig.
I'm probably asking too many questions, but I really do not know much about Linux.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Quoting - tim18
Maybe you had the source command for the compiler in a login script, such as .profile. Such things might be disturbed with the upgrade. If you upgraded the compiler, you may have several versions installed; if you were pointing to an older version of the shared libraries at run time, it may have worked up to a point.
If you used another mechanism, such as ldconfig, it very likely got changed without recognizing Intel software in the OS upgrade. You would have to update it with the current Intel library directory. I suppose it's easy to get messed up with software upgrades if using ldconfig.
If you used another mechanism, such as ldconfig, it very likely got changed without recognizing Intel software in the OS upgrade. You would have to update it with the current Intel library directory. I suppose it's easy to get messed up with software upgrades if using ldconfig.
consist only one line
include /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page