- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm including CL/cl.hpp. However, I see that 'clCreatePipe' is defined in CL/cl.h. In the comments section of cl.hpp, it explicitely says,
* The interface is contained with a single C++ header file \em cl.hpp and all
* definitions are contained within the namespace \em cl. There is no additional
* requirement to include \em cl.h and to use either the C++ or original C
* bindings it is enough to simply include \em cl.hpp.
However, cl.hpp does not declare "clCreatePipe". I will need to include cl.h even though the header says I don't. Is it OK then to also include cl.h (before cl.hpp)?
In my code, I tried also adding the cl:: namespace (cl::clCreatePipe), but got the same error.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It looks like I have to do
#define CL_TARGET_OPENCL_VERSION 200
#include <CL/opencl.h>
in my host code, per Appendix 3 in the OpenCL programmers guide. It now compiles.
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It looks like I have to do
#define CL_TARGET_OPENCL_VERSION 200
#include <CL/opencl.h>
in my host code, per Appendix 3 in the OpenCL programmers guide. It now compiles.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
Yes, you have to define CL_TARGET_OPENCL_VERSION 200 in order to used OpenCL 2.0 features.
Thanks
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page