Intel® Quartus® Prime Software
Intel® Quartus® Prime Design Software, Design Entry, Synthesis, Simulation, Verification, Timing Analysis, System Design (Platform Designer, formerly Qsys)
16595 Discussions

Quartus Pro 22.2: enum logic vs logic : Error(16983): arrays have different elements

alexislms
Valued Contributor I
1,057 Views

 

 

module tb;
  enum logic [7:0] {A, B, C} fsm [4];
  logic [7:0] state [4];
  assign state = fsm;
endmodule

 

Never had an issue with Vivado and never had an issue with Modelsim: https://www.edaplayground.com/x/S3Va

 

With Quartus Pro 22.2, I get Error(16983): arrays have different elements 

 

I believe this should be allowed by the specs.

 

Regards,

0 Kudos
1 Solution
RichardTanSY_Intel
922 Views

Yes, there is a plan to fix this but it may takes time and I do not have the exact detail on when it will be fix. As this is subject to change.


View solution in original post

11 Replies
RichardTanSY_Intel
1,034 Views

Let me check this with the engineering team.


0 Kudos
RichardTanSY_Intel
1,008 Views

Fyi, the engineering team is working on this.

Please do expect that any work involves engineering may takes some time depending on the issue complexity. 


Best Regards,

Richard Tan


0 Kudos
RichardTanSY_Intel
984 Views

May I know are these code for testbench usage?

 

0 Kudos
alexislms
Valued Contributor I
979 Views

Not only, we mainly use it in our synthesizable code.

0 Kudos
RichardTanSY_Intel
963 Views

A workaround suggested by the engineering team is to change RTL a little bit.

By changing the assignment of unpacked type to bit by bit instead of complete.


for the given design example


module tb; 

 enum logic [7:0] {A, B, C} fsm [4];

 logic [7:0] state [4];

 assign state[0] = fsm[0];

 assign state[1] = fsm[1];

assign state[2] = fsm[2];

 assign state[3] = fsm[3];

//assign state = fsm;      

endmodule


The engineering team will check with the tool vendor on fixing this issue.


0 Kudos
alexislms
Valued Contributor I
957 Views

@RichardTanSY_Intel  Thank you for the follow-up.

The workaround defeats the purpose of these data types, we will wait for the fix.

 

Regards,

0 Kudos
RichardTanSY_Intel
941 Views

Do you able to escape the error based on the last email that I sent?


0 Kudos
alexislms
Valued Contributor I
933 Views

Can we expect this to be fixed in a new release?

0 Kudos
RichardTanSY_Intel
923 Views

Yes, there is a plan to fix this but it may takes time and I do not have the exact detail on when it will be fix. As this is subject to change.


alexislms
Valued Contributor I
914 Views

Thank you, please feel free to close the case.

0 Kudos
RichardTanSY_Intel
887 Views

With that, I will now transition this thread to community support. If you have a new question, feel free to open a new thread to get the support from Intel experts. Otherwise, the community users will continue to help you on this thread. Thank you.

 

Best Regards,

Richard Tan

 

p/s: If any answer from the community or Intel Support are helpful, please feel free to give best answer or rate 9/10 survey.


0 Kudos
Reply