- Als neu kennzeichnen
- Lesezeichen
- Abonnieren
- Stummschalten
- RSS-Feed abonnieren
- Kennzeichnen
- Anstößigen Inhalt melden
I got forced into an Arria II GX due to lack of resources in an Arria GX. I was, with the Arria GX, able to assign the pin loading for each pin in my SO-DIMM interface. The Arria II GX forces me to do a more complex loading analysis for the pins in my SO-DIMM interface because individual pin capacitance assignments are not available - the enable_advanced_io_timing timequest setting is forced on and can't be turned off via the GUI - see attached screenshot.
Is there any way to turn off enable_advanced_io_timing so i still can use the simpler capacitive loading model? Is this safe for the Arria II GX? I'm designing a 200 MHz SO-DIMM interface. Since a capacitive loading model was good enough for the Arria GX, it should be good enough for the Arria II GX at the same SO-DIMM clock speed?Link kopiert
1 Antworten
- Als neu kennzeichnen
- Lesezeichen
- Abonnieren
- Stummschalten
- RSS-Feed abonnieren
- Kennzeichnen
- Anstößigen Inhalt melden
Okay, I have figured out that I can add in the far-end load capacitance per pin for my SO-DIMM interface. Once I have the actual distributed L/C of the traces (from Hyperlynx after layout) I will update the board trace models in the pin planner.
I am however not quite clear how the near-end pin capacitance is modeled. My bidir DQ pins are shown in the board trace model edit screen as output pins (see attached screen shot). Should I just add the Arria II DQ pin capacitance in the Cn text box and ignore that the graphics shows the driver/receiver in the wrong direction? Thanks.
Antworten
Themen-Optionen
- RSS-Feed abonnieren
- Thema als neu kennzeichnen
- Thema als gelesen kennzeichnen
- Diesen Thema für aktuellen Benutzer floaten
- Lesezeichen
- Abonnieren
- Drucker-Anzeigeseite