- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
When I create a PLL IP via Quartus (22.4 pro),
It also creates .sdc constraint for it which clashes with my .sdc constraint (duplicate point, not possible to set as async group ..).
I couldn't see an option in the GUI to turn it off while creating the PLL (stratix 10),
but I do see in the .ip that it has an option for that:
<ipxact:parameter parameterId="gui_skip_sdc_generation" type="bit">
<ipxact:name>gui_skip_sdc_generation</ipxact:name>
<ipxact:displayName></ipxact:displayName>
<ipxact:value>false</ipxact:value>
</ipxact:parameter>
How to change it into true in the GUI to skip the sdc generation?
Can I otherwise comment out the sdc file pointer in the .qip to make sure it is not used in Quartus?
set_instance_assignment -entity "free_running_48mhz_pll_altera_iopll_1931_3tltc2i" -library "altera_iopll_1931" -name SDC_ENTITY_FILE [file join $::quartus(qip_path) "altera_iopll_1931/synth/free_running_48mhz_pll_altera_iopll_1931_3tltc2i.sdc"] -no_sdc_promotion -no_auto_inst_discovery
Note: When I remove the .sdc from the Quartus settings windows,
It removes the entire .qip line in the .qsf ...
Thanks,
Alex.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Unfortunately, we don't have a notification system in place. However, I can provide you with a ticket ID [15013771573] so that you can submit a new case and get an updates on this enhancement request status from the respective agent. This will allow you to inquire about the status of the request, whether it is planned, implemented, or rejected. I suggest requesting an update after approximately one year or so.
It's worth mentioning that there is a backlog of enhancement requests on the engineering side, and resources are limited. This is the reason for the extended timeframe required.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best Regards,
Richard Tan
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
When I comment out the .sdc in the .qip, this is better, I do not get the duplicated clock points.
Side effect is that there is one point in each PLL that has no clock definition:
Info(13166): Register stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|pmu_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~pll_e_reg__nff is being clocked by stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|pmu_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg Info(13166): Register stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|free_running_48mhz_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~pll_e_reg__nff is being clocked by stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|free_running_48mhz_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg Info(13166): Register stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~pll_e_reg__nff is being clocked by stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg Info(13166): Latch stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_48M_clk_enable is being clocked by stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~c0cntr_reg Warning(332060): Node: stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|pmu_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg was determined to be a clock but was found without an associated clock assignment. Info(13166): Register stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|pmu_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~pll_e_reg__nff is being clocked by stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|pmu_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg Warning(332060): Node: stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|free_running_48mhz_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg was determined to be a clock but was found without an associated clock assignment. Info(13166): Register stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|free_running_48mhz_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~pll_e_reg__nff is being clocked by stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|free_running_48mhz_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg Warning(332060): Node: stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg was determined to be a clock but was found without an associated clock assignment. Info(13166): Register stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~pll_e_reg__nff is being clocked by stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~ncntr_reg Warning(332060): Node: stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~c0cntr_reg was determined to be a clock but was found without an associated clock assignment. Info(13166): Latch stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_48M_clk_enable is being clocked by stratix10_fpga_a_mix_inst|PMU_TOP|flash_pll_i|iopll_0|stratix10_altera_iopll_i|s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~c0cntr_reg
(s10_iopll.fourteennm_pll~c0cntr_reg)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
By default, you can't edit this parameter in the IOPLL IP as it is invisible, but you can do some script changes and make it visible in the GUI when you initialize the IP.
Find altera_iopll_init.tcl file in the <quartus installation directory>\ip\altera\altera_iopll\common, go to line 301 and changes it from:
{gui_skip_sdc_generation BOOLEAN "" "" false true false \
true "" } \
to:
{gui_skip_sdc_generation BOOLEAN "" "" true true false \
true "" } \
After that, open the iopll.ip parameter editor GUI, in your Quartus project navigator, and you can see Parameter tab and an option "gui_skip_sdc_generation" pop up. Click it to enable it.
Best Regards,
Richard Tan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank You for this info Richard but
as Quartus is installed centrally by our IT, I cannot change the option.
Would that be possible to make the option visible by default in a future version of Quartus?
Thanks.
Alex.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I can check with the engineering team to see if they are okay with making the changes.
Before I make the request, could you help provide justification for why you want to skip the SDC generation?
You may provide details on the specific problem or limitation you faced, the benefits of this feature, or any additional feedback that may help.
Best Regards,
Richard Tan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks Richard.
I want to disable the SDC generation because I'm not able to make the different clock outputs of the PLL
asynchronous clock domain (due to the generated .sdc which define clock points in not async group).
I already do defined myself the PLL clock output and the clock domains.
Alex.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If you're trying to use set_clock_groups, can't you just add them to your top-level .sdc file which would override the PLL .sdc?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have submitted an enhancement request to our engineering team.
Please be aware that implementing new features or enhancements for Quartus can be a time-consuming process.
We appreciate your understanding and patience regarding this matter.
If you require any further assistance or have additional questions, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Best Regards,
Richard Tan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank You very much Richard!
Will I get a notification when it is implemented?
Thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Unfortunately, we don't have a notification system in place. However, I can provide you with a ticket ID [15013771573] so that you can submit a new case and get an updates on this enhancement request status from the respective agent. This will allow you to inquire about the status of the request, whether it is planned, implemented, or rejected. I suggest requesting an update after approximately one year or so.
It's worth mentioning that there is a backlog of enhancement requests on the engineering side, and resources are limited. This is the reason for the extended timeframe required.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best Regards,
Richard Tan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ok.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for acknowledging the solution provided. I'm glad to hear that your question has been addressed. Now, I will transition this thread to community support.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out.
Thank you and have a great day!
Best Regards,
Richard Tan
p/s: If you find any answers from the community or Intel Support to be helpful, we encourage you to mark them as the best answer or rate them 4/5 in the survey.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page