- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm attempting to use the Fast Poisson Solver routines from the oneMKL library. The driver, in Fortran, is provided in the attachment.
The solver works, however the corner values at locations (1,1) and (1,0) seem to be wrong, when compared with the output of a different solver.
What could be the problem?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I realized it was an error on my side. The boundary arrays are of length nx+1 and ny+1, but I was wrongly only setting the first nx, ny values. Hence, there was by default a 0.0 in the last value.
The boundary routine is supposed to read
subroutine fbd(nx,ny,x,y,bd_ax,bd_bx,bd_ay,bd_by)
integer, intent(in) :: nx, ny
real(dp), intent(in) :: x(nx+1), y(ny+1)
real(dp), intent(out) :: bd_ax(ny+1), bd_bx(ny+1)
real(dp), intent(out) :: bd_ay(nx+1), bd_by(nx+1)
! boundaries are given by
! u(x,y) = cos( pi x ) - sin( 2 pi y )
bd_ax = cos(pi*0.0_dp) - sin(2*pi*y) ! x = 0
bd_bx = cos(pi*1.0_dp) - sin(2*pi*y) ! x = 1
bd_ay = cos(pi*x) - sin(2*pi*0.0_dp) ! y = 0
bd_by = cos(pi*x) - sin(2*pi*1.0_dp) ! y = 1
end subroutine
Now the solution matches the multigrid solver in the link in my original post.
Poisson solution (correct)
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Ivan, I am not quite sure which results you are expecting to see here.
running with the current version of oneMKL, I see
1.00000000000000 0.000000000000000E+000 0.000000000000000E+000
.....
1.00000000000000 1.00000000000000 0.000000000000000E+000
Which results do you see with another solvers?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I realized it was an error on my side. The boundary arrays are of length nx+1 and ny+1, but I was wrongly only setting the first nx, ny values. Hence, there was by default a 0.0 in the last value.
The boundary routine is supposed to read
subroutine fbd(nx,ny,x,y,bd_ax,bd_bx,bd_ay,bd_by)
integer, intent(in) :: nx, ny
real(dp), intent(in) :: x(nx+1), y(ny+1)
real(dp), intent(out) :: bd_ax(ny+1), bd_bx(ny+1)
real(dp), intent(out) :: bd_ay(nx+1), bd_by(nx+1)
! boundaries are given by
! u(x,y) = cos( pi x ) - sin( 2 pi y )
bd_ax = cos(pi*0.0_dp) - sin(2*pi*y) ! x = 0
bd_bx = cos(pi*1.0_dp) - sin(2*pi*y) ! x = 1
bd_ay = cos(pi*x) - sin(2*pi*0.0_dp) ! y = 0
bd_by = cos(pi*x) - sin(2*pi*1.0_dp) ! y = 1
end subroutine
Now the solution matches the multigrid solver in the link in my original post.
Poisson solution (correct)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ok, then the thread is closing.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page