Programmable Devices
CPLDs, FPGAs, SoC FPGAs, Configuration, and Transceivers
21088 Discussions

EF1S10F484C7 Optional Suffix and RoHS

BAMeyer
Beginner
1,446 Views

1.  What does the Optional Suffix "N" mean for the EF1S10F484C7N?  

2. Is the EF1S10F484C7 RoHS compliant, if so is a declaration available

0 Kudos
4 Replies
NurAiman_M_Intel
Employee
1,431 Views

Hi,

 

Thank you for contacting Intel community.

 

Sorry to tell you that we did not have any record for EF1S10F484C7N in our system. Please ensure to enter the correct part number.

 

Thank you.

 

Regards,

Aiman

0 Kudos
NurAiman_M_Intel
Employee
1,418 Views

Hi,


Any update on this request?


Regards,

Aiman



0 Kudos
BAMeyer
Beginner
1,410 Views

Sorry, the correct part number is EP1S10F484C7N. 

I have been able to find a number of documents:  PCN0902, RoHS Declaration dated Aug. 29 2013, REACH Declaration dated Dec 17, 2015, and a Conflict Minerals statement dated April 2016. I have attached all.

From these documents, I believe the N in EP1S10F484C7N identifies the part as a GREEN part and is RoHS2 compliant and RoHS3 compliant.  I also believe the non "N" part is RoHS 3 compliant because non of REACH SVHC are noted in either the REACH or Conflict Minerals statement.

We have a design we need to support for another 4-5 years and need to be able to use either the EP1S10F484C7N or EP1S10F484C7. 

If possible can you identify the differences between the two parts?

0 Kudos
NurAiman_M_Intel
Employee
1,403 Views

Hi,


Thank you for your update.


The difference between the two part number is EP1S10F484C7 is NOT RoHS compliant while EP1S10F484C7N is RoHS compliant. The symbol 'N' at the end of the part number indicate that it is RoHS compliant. Hence customer is advisable to use EP1S10F484C7N which is RoHS compliant.

However, please be noted that Stratix has been obsolete. It is recommended to use latest Stratix family which are Stratix III, IV, V and 10 as we do not provide support for obsolete product as we only have less information for it.


Thanks.


Regards,

Aiman


0 Kudos
Reply