Programmable Devices
CPLDs, FPGAs, SoC FPGAs, Configuration, and Transceivers
公告
FPGA community forums and blogs on community.intel.com are migrating to the new Altera Community and are read-only. For urgent support needs during this transition, please visit the FPGA Design Resources page or contact an Altera Authorized Distributor.
21615 讨论

Reducing ground bounce

Altera_Forum
名誉分销商 II
2,213 次查看

Does anyone know if the no connect pins can be used as a way to reduce ground bounce?

0 项奖励
5 回复数
Altera_Forum
名誉分销商 II
1,099 次查看

I've done some testing in SSN and found that simply having a no connect or tri-stated pin to separate aggressors from a victim pin, will reduce ground bounce the same amount as having programmable grounds. Proximity of aggressors to victims is the biggest contribute to SSN for FPGAs, so separating the sea of aggressors in a bus is a good design practice.

0 项奖励
Altera_Forum
名誉分销商 II
1,099 次查看

The no connect pins have no functionality since they are not connected internally to the die so by tying the N/C pins to VCC or GND this will not help with ground bounce.

0 项奖励
Altera_Forum
名誉分销商 II
1,099 次查看

True, true. In the tests we attempted, the pin locations that were tri-stated actually bonded to pads on the die which dispursed the SSOs at the the pad level. A no connect doesn't have any pad connection and thus probably won't help reduce SSN. The point of my post was that we found SSO is reduced by either a tri-stated pin next to the aggressors or a programmable GND. No real difference, at least on Stratix II.

0 项奖励
Altera_Forum
名誉分销商 II
1,099 次查看

Thanks tag818, that is what I was looking for

0 项奖励
Altera_Forum
名誉分销商 II
1,099 次查看

No problem. Glad to help

0 项奖励
回复