- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Does anyone know if the no connect pins can be used as a way to reduce ground bounce?
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I've done some testing in SSN and found that simply having a no connect or tri-stated pin to separate aggressors from a victim pin, will reduce ground bounce the same amount as having programmable grounds. Proximity of aggressors to victims is the biggest contribute to SSN for FPGAs, so separating the sea of aggressors in a bus is a good design practice.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The no connect pins have no functionality since they are not connected internally to the die so by tying the N/C pins to VCC or GND this will not help with ground bounce.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
True, true. In the tests we attempted, the pin locations that were tri-stated actually bonded to pads on the die which dispursed the SSOs at the the pad level. A no connect doesn't have any pad connection and thus probably won't help reduce SSN. The point of my post was that we found SSO is reduced by either a tri-stated pin next to the aggressors or a programmable GND. No real difference, at least on Stratix II.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks tag818, that is what I was looking for
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
No problem. Glad to help
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page