- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
This is easily repoducible. Pl fix this ASAP.
Lien copié
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
I've ran analyze -v and attached the output. I've also attached the dump from msinfo32 command... if it's useful at all.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Thanks for attached docs.
Unfortunately there is no present callstack can you run kb command?I am afraid that because of PG crash callstack could not be reconstructed.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Tomorrow I wil look at kernel dump.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Did preliminary analysis of your kernel dump.Unfortunately cannot get call stack there is only call to BugCheckEx function displayed.Looked at SSDT table which seems to be partially overwritten.GDT selectors are different for entries 8 and 9.
Uploaded txt file of manual windbg analysis.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
There are a whole bunch of people having the same problem with VirtualBox, and it looks like the workaround for now is to limit the number of CPU to 1 per VM (or to disable I/O APIC all together). I am not sure if this is VirtualBox(Oracle) issue, or the Intel chip issue, or Windows 8.1 issue..
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Hi
Was not able to recreate the call stack of the crash I will give another try today.I suspect that automated windbg analysis will not work when the PatchGuard brings down the system.The faulting IP deep inside ntoskrnl.exe belongs to KeBugCheckEx which simply loads stack with return value stored in rcx register.Today I will continue investigation of that dump file and will try somehow to obtain trap frame and maybe from there dump rsp registers in order to reconstruct the call stack.
Can anyone post the content of GDT selectors only those users whose BSOD has value of 0x3 corrupted GDT.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
The problem is that BSOD in some cases has different values one of them points to corrupted GDT and second points to overwritten MSR register.In your case it seems that GDT was corrupted (relying only on BSOD info).
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Emulator-x86.exe threads and their call stacks.Use !teb on address of Thread Environment Block to dump stack address and its size next use dqs esp -3000 esp+3000 to dump raw stack data.
Hope that this information will be helpful in problem solving.
[ffffe000054a5900 emulator-x86.e]
10e8.000b90 ffffe000054d2080 ffffdfbf Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForMultipleObjects+0x40a
nt!ObWaitForMultipleObjects+0x289
nt!NtWaitForMultipleObjects32+0xda
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.0010f4 ffffe0000556a880 ffffeeb6 Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeRemoveQueueEx+0x275
nt!IoRemoveIoCompletion+0x8a
nt!NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory+0x30a
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x7fff5fa7806a
10e8.0010c8 ffffe00005394880 ffffe736 Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeRemoveQueueEx+0x275
nt!IoRemoveIoCompletion+0x8a
nt!NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory+0x30a
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x7fff5fa7806a
10e8.0011f4 ffffe00005565500 ffffe3fa Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.001020 ffffe0000553d080 ffffe953 Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.001194 ffffe0000553c080 ffffdfbf Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForMultipleObjects+0x228
nt!ObWaitForMultipleObjects+0x289
nt!NtWaitForMultipleObjects32+0xda
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.0011c0 ffffe0000552d080 ffffebab Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForMultipleObjects+0x228
nt!ObWaitForMultipleObjects+0x289
nt!NtWaitForMultipleObjects32+0xda
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.001180 ffffe00005709680 ffffe64b Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeRemoveQueueEx+0x275
nt!IoRemoveIoCompletion+0x8a
nt!NtWaitForWorkViaWorkerFactory+0x30a
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x7fff5fa7806a
10e8.001034 ffffe000055fb080 ffffe569 Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeRemoveQueueEx+0x275
nt!IoRemoveIoCompletion+0x8a
nt!NtRemoveIoCompletion+0x124
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.000f74 ffffe00004543080 ffffe3fa Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.000c1c ffffe00005453080 ffffe857 Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.000aa4 ffffe0000573f880 ffffe858 Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.000988 ffffe00004636080 ffffe9e5 Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.0007a4 ffffe00004d07880 ffffe4ab Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.0006b4 ffffe00005738080 ffffe842 Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.000f28 ffffe00006155080 ffffe3fa Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
10e8.0008e0 ffffe000061d1880 ffffe4ad Blocked nt!KiSwapContext+0x76
nt!KiSwapThread+0x14e
nt!KiCommitThreadWait+0x127
nt!KeWaitForSingleObject+0x248
nt!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xb2
nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
+0x77122772
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Thanks iliyapolak, to be honest I don't understand anything af all this stuff, but I'm sure it could be helpful to whom is capable of reading.
But...who should we blame? It's Microsoft fault, becouse with win8 things worked? Or it's a internal problem related to Intel? And most importantly: are the two companies aware of this situation?.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Hi Matteo
I know it is not easy stuff to understand ,but in case of such a problems debugging at machine code level is needed to understand what went wrong.I hope that someone at Intel maybe HAXM developers could find it helpful.
Regarding the problem I do not think that this is MS fault.I think that it is more misbehaved kernel mode code.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Hi Alexander
Were Intel engineers able to reconstruct the call stack?
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Finally had the time to create a kerneldump from a Android Emulator with HAXM crash:
https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=42E041A300BECF72!709&authkey=!AFCO5_AiJyBbCcM
800mb original size, compressed with 7zip.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Can you look at last parameter of BSOD was it 3 or 7?
Regarding dump I will manually analyze tomorrow and post the results.It really puzzles me that automated analysis does not work.I suppose that in case of PatchGuard initiated crash it is simply not performed by windbg heuristic engine.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
My Windows 8.1 PC crashes due to H/W acceleration for android emulator. Once I unstalled it, there is no crash any longer. Looking forward to a fix for this.
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Alex- same problem using avd/haxm with IDEA for android devel. Xeon 1245-v3 other details here. http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=61399 sorry just have a minidump
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Hi,
we probably found the root cause of the issue. We testing this at the moment internally. Thanks for all the helpful posts. This really contributed a lot to find the issue.
I will keep you updated in this post .
Alex
- Marquer comme nouveau
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Sourdine
- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Surligner
- Imprimer
- Signaler un contenu inapproprié
Hi Alexander
Can you share more details?
Thanks in advance

- S'abonner au fil RSS
- Marquer le sujet comme nouveau
- Marquer le sujet comme lu
- Placer ce Sujet en tête de liste pour l'utilisateur actuel
- Marquer
- S'abonner
- Page imprimable