- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I would like to set up a Linux machine, being able to run Windows via Xen in parallel to play some games. According to http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq 7.3 the usage of 3D graphics in DomU is not possible. But point 3 of section 7.3 says that IOMMU would enable this feature. Since VT-d is Intel's equivalent to IOMMU, I would like to buy a mainboard supporting this technology.
Now it is hard to point out which chipsets support VT-d. The appropriate VT-d doc of Xen ( http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr/source/docs/misc/vtd.txt ) only references some sample mainboards and machines, these only seem to be such with Q35 chipset / vPro.
A vmware presentation ( http://communities.vmware.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/702997-1574/NE-VMUG%20-%20Intel%20Pres%20-%20071907%20-%20p%20King%20-%20revised.pdf Slide 15) says, that Seaburg and Bearlake chipsets would support VT-d - but Bearlake would not only include Q35, but also P35, X38, ...
So please could someone lighten up this a bit?
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Bearlake and Seaburg are north bridges in the platform, they handle the DMA remapping capability within the chipset (see the VT-d public specifcation etc.). The suffix is more about the SKU fusing than the fundamental chipset capabilities.
Enabling the chipset in BIOS does not guarantee the kernel/OS/VMM is properly configured/compiled to support it.
Xen 3.2 final (released last week) has support for VT-d and tboot (trusted boot).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
thank you for your reply. I am also interested in the VT-d technology. Anyhow I must admit the question was not really cleared up for me. From your post I get the message that all Bearlake and Seaburg chipsets will support VT-d. Nevertheless this document http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/datashts/316966.htm, page 33 does not say so. It reads "Intel VT-d is only supported by the Intel Q35 Express
chipset." which would exclude the Q33, G33 and P35 based platforms. Could you please clarify your statements a bit?
Thank you in advance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Are these chipsets available in market? Can I buy a server with vt-d capability today?
Thanks,
Vivek.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Xeon 5400 (DP) or Xeon 3200/3210 (UP)based chipset have VT-d technology. VT-d requires BIOS enabling. Please check with the OEMs offering servers and WS based on Xeon 5400 or Xeon 3200/3210 chipsets if they have the VT-d enabled in the BIOS.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks MADhradhakr, this is useful.
Vivek.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
What about Bearlake or Seaburg chipsets VT-d support?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Some (external) news also state that Eaglelake will have vt-d support, but it'll only arrive 2008Q2
I'd specifically like to know whether the P35 supports vt-d, as it supports DDR3, as opposed to the Q35. It's frustrating that there are no good sources indicating this capability anywhere...
So, a comprehensive list of chipsets that do support vt-d and those that will be released in the near future would be nice.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I asked this question recently for Intel Desktop Boards, and the answer I got back was:
VT-d is enabled on the following chipsets:
Intel Q35 GMCH with ICH9 DO (Bearlake chipset)
The following chipsets have VT-d capability, but OEMs may not have enabled in systems based on these:
Intel X38
Intel X48
VT-d will be enabled on these future products:
Intel Q45 (Eaglelake)
For Intel Desktop Boards, these have VT-d support enabled:Intel DQ35JO
Intel DQ35MP
Intel DX38BT
Intel DX48BT2
These future Intel Desktop Boards will have VT-d support:
Intel DQ45CB
Intel DQ45EK
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Is there any information when Q45 or in this case the DQ45CB/DQ45CB will be on the market?
I caught some specs here indicating availability in 2Q2008, but from other sources I saw that Q45 will not be available before the second half of 2008, maybe even fall...
Except for the integrated graphics (X3100 vs X3500) and AMT capabilities (3.0 vs 5.0) what will be major differences between Q35 and Q45, especially when looking for virtualization (Xen) support?
Thanks,
Raz
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@bejam: In theory yes, however I'm not aware of any success yet. I saw people trying this with XEN, but PCI-e passthrough seems to lack some GFX optimizations so far. Another issue could be the closed source drivers from manufacturers like ATI and nVidia. (Praise Intel for their Open Source drivers!)
Best regards,
Razor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
After contacting Intel support they informed me the board definitely supports VT, and I must not have the option because my CPU didn't support VT. They then included a hyperlink to a page on intel.com that showed my CPU was VT capable...
I find it difficult to believe that a combination of D5400XS and E5320 doesn't support VT properly. Anyone else having the same problem, or found a solution?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
So, silly me, went and purchased a CPU from that list and guess what? It still doesn't offer VT support.
So one snotty email to Intel support later and 554.68 down, I'll listen to your advice and await a BIOS update that enables a feature that, according to Intel's own site, the motherboard already supports.
Grrrr.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The Intel 5400 chipset is designed for systems based on the Intel processors Dual Core Intel Xeon Processor 5100 series, Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5300 series, Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5400 series, and Dual-Core Intel Xeon Processor 5200 series
So, watch out, there is an Intel 5400 series chipset (aka Seaburg) AND there is a Intel Xeon Processor 5400 series (aka Harpertown). Intel just wants to confuse us :-)
Here is a site with all the Intel Processors listed which support VT (VT-d is NOT specifically referred to!!):
http://compare.intel.com/pcc/default.aspx?familyid=5&culture=en-US&iid=products_xeon5000+body_compare
This link compares the 5000p server chipset (no VT support!) and the 5400 server chipset (with VT support):
http://compare.intel.com/pcc/showchart.aspx?mmID=24664,28047&familyID=9&culture=en-US
So, virtually all current Xeon processors support VT, but currently only one chipset (5400 aka Seaburg) support VT-d. It should be noted, that the BIOS also should allow it to enable VT. And even then, when all three conditions are met, there is no guarantee that it will work flawlessly.
The equivalent of the Seaburg (5400) server chipset for the desktop PCs is the Q35 chipset aka Bearlake-Q, with VT-d support. All other Bearlake variants in the 3-Series chipset do NOT support VT-d, as far as I know.
This is what I understand after I dug into this. I may be wrong, so anyone who can amend my above deliberations, please do so.
To respond to your question: no I don't think your server board with 3210 chipset supports VT-d.
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page