- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I am looking to define an EP with a BAR defined as IO instead of memory inorder to test the IO / CNFG PCI ordering rules .
I thought it would be as easy as going into an existing design and re-defining the BAR type ... It appears the IO BAR type is only supported by "Legacy Endpoints" . Does anyone know why this is or how to get around it ? Thanks, Bob.- Tags:
- Intel® Stratix®
- PCIe
Link Copied
3 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
IO style endpoints aren't really supported in PCIe. They only exist so that legacy PCI cards can be attached via a PCIe to PCI bridge. I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out they don't work. I wouldn't be upset about it either. It's basically legacy garbage that should be ignored in a modern design.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- IO style endpoints aren't really supported in PCIe. They only exist so that legacy PCI cards can be attached via a PCIe to PCI bridge. I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out they don't work. I wouldn't be upset about it either. It's basically legacy garbage that should be ignored in a modern design. --- Quote End --- Thanks Galfonz. I'm not particularly interested in IO and understand the point you make but I am interested in testing ordering rules for IO and Configuration Writes / Reads per the specified rules since IO and Configuration are handled differently ... Since IO and Configuration are treated the same with respect to ordering , I thought IO would be easier to implement. If it is't easy to implement with the hard PCIe IP I have access to ... then I will look to the Keysight and LeCroy Exerciser cards that I have access to.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It's definitely going to be easier to use something that will generate the kind of traffic you are interested in and a monitor to view what the responses are than it would be to implement something with an FPGA, hard IP or soft.
![](/skins/images/406383E7D32C62C6E4F7327A35AB307E/responsive_peak/images/icon_anonymous_message.png)
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page