- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi All,
I'm receiving the "Error (10759): Verilog HDL error at rly.v(18): object rl_sck declared in a list of port declarations cannot be re-declared within the module body" on the following code:
module rly
(//** System
input clk,
input rstn,
output rl_sck,
);
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//* DECLARATIONS
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
reg rl_sck;
endmodule
why this is an error? This is actually a legal verilog-2001 syntax. This module is defined as SystemVerilog HDL file in Quartus-II. Thank you!
Link Copied
4 Replies
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Remove the comma after rl_sck in the port list.
Cheers, Alex- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
SystemVerilog is SystemVerilog-2005, and the LRM 19.8 says:
--- Quote Start --- For the first port, if neither a type nor a direction is specified, then it shall be assumed to be a member of a port list, and any port direction or type declarations must be declared after the port list. This is compatible with the Verilog-1995 syntax. If the first port kind or data type is specified, but no direction is specified, then the port direction shall default to inout. If the first port direction is specified, but no port kind or data type is specified, then the port shall default to a net of net type wire. This default net type can be changed using the ‘default_nettype compiler directive, as in Verilog. --- Quote End --- So because you declared rl_sck as output, it defaults to wire type and cannot be re-declared So yes - it is legal 2001 syntax, but not 2005 (which systemverilog is)- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks! It's really that SV-2005 is no so compatible with V-2001!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
--- Quote Start --- Thanks! It's really that SV-2005 is no so compatible with V-2001! --- Quote End --- Yes - SV is not fully backward compatible.
Reply
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page