- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

I have the following code, and in the kernel the norm is get from the rowdata and row data is dependent on the thread ID.

In the myfastsquaredDistance function, the if else statement is dependent on the norm, thus when I compile, it gives warning that it cannot vectorize. Does anyone know how to get around this? Thanks!

double myfastSquaredDistance(__constant double *rowdata, __constant double *rowcenter, double norm1, double norm2, int n, int y)

{

double precision = 1e-6;

double sumSquaredNorm = norm1 * norm1 + norm2 * norm2;

double normDiff = norm1 - norm2;

double sqDist = 0.0;

double precisionBound1 = 2.0 * epsilon() * sumSquaredNorm / (normDiff * normDiff + epsilon());

if (precisionBound1 < precision) {

sqDist = sumSquaredNorm - 2.0 * mydot(rowdata, rowcenter, n, y);

} else {

sqDist = sqdist(rowdata, rowcenter, n, y);

}

return sqDist;

}

__attribute__((num_simd_work_items(4)))

__attribute__((reqd_work_group_size(32,1,1)))

__kernel

void kmeansTest(

int num_vectors,

int vector_length,

int num_clusters,

__constant double* restrict data,

__constant double* restrict center,

__global double* restrict result

)

{

const uint y = get_global_id(0);

int bestindex;

double norm1, norm2;

double min_distance = FLT_MAX;

__constant double* rowdata = &data [y * (vector_length + 1)];

norm1 = rowdata[vector_length];

for (int i = 0; i < num_clusters; ++i){

double dotProduct = 0;

double precision = 1e-6;

__constant double *rowcenter = center + i * (vector_length + 1);

norm2 = rowcenter[vector_length];

dotProduct = myfastSquaredDistance(data, rowcenter, norm1, norm2, vector_length, y);

if(dotProduct < min_distance){

min_distance = dotProduct;

bestindex = i;

}

}

result[y * 2] = bestindex;

result[y * 2 + 1] = sqrt(min_distance);

}

Link Copied

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi,

Currently I am reviewing the forum for any open questions and found this thread. I apologize that no one seems to answer this question that you posted. Since it has been a while you posted this question, I'm wondering if you have found the answer? If not, please let me know, I will try to assign someone to assist you. Thank you.

Regards,

Nooraini

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi,

I haven't figured out the answer yet. If you can find someone to help me that would be great. Thanks!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi RJin1,

Sure, I'm checking here to find someone that may able to assist you on this thread.

Regards,

Nooraini

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

16.0 sdk

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Your code does not compile as it is due to missing definition for many of the functions. I believe it requires an external header. Please provide a code snippet that can be compiled (preferably using the code insertion mechanism provided in the forum so that indentation is preserved) so that we can take a look at the report and compiler messages. I fail to see why this cannot be vectorized, though; the statement in the condition does not depend on thread-ID, only its value does. You might be able to get around it using the (condition) ? (value1) : (value2) notation instead of if/else.

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page