- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello.
I am using a stratix10 with Quartus 22.1-pro (rocky linux).
my design uses an asynchronous reset that reaches most of the logic, resulting in very high tension.
I have seen that some timing violations in some regions, when fixed, lead to other new timing violations on unrelated regions, therefore i imagine the tension at the reset line could help to relax timing.
However i was not able to duplicate the last register of my synchronization chain:
. the automatic duplication ignored those registers (with no message)
. the "manual register duplication" assignment (DUPLICATE_REGISTER) accepts only the "-to" parameter, and it was ignored (but not mentioned in the ignored assignments)
. i have not tried yet the DUPLICATE_HIERARCHY_DEPTH.. but i have the feeling it will not work either.
Is there a common approach to solve this?
Kind regards,
Rp
Link Copied
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Update:
the "ignored assignments" report did not mention the rejected assignments but the duplication report did.
The assignments were rejected because of "synchronization register"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you try max_fanout?
Also, it's possible Quartus is identifying this as a synchronization chain and trying to preserve it to prevent metastability. I don't see why that would prevent duplicating the final register in the chain, but it's something to look at.
Also, since this is a hyperflex device, it's possible that hyper-retiming or some related attribute is preventing the duplication. Do you have keep/preserve anywhere?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I manage to have the duplication working , by adding a "pipeline chain" (with 4 stages) after the module containing the synchronization chain. But the duplication is really not smart: i got 1 duplicate with 1FF fanout and the other duplicate with 200FFs fanout.
So now i am trying with the DUPLICATE_HIERARCHY_DEPTH assignment applied to the last of the pipe-registers i have added (and value=2). But i am not able to see any duplication happening.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Update:
It seems that the issue on the missing hierarchical duplication is:
"Register has secondary signals: rcv_s10_top|sys_clk_rst|ilkn_cd_rst_sync[2].rst_pipe|pipe_reg[3][0]".
I attach the post-synthesis technology map viewer for reference, generated with the following assignments active:
set_instance_assignment -name GLOBAL_SIGNAL OFF -to rcv_s10_top|sys_clk_rst|ilkn_cd_rst_sync[*].rst_pipe|pipe_reg[*][0]
set_instance_assignment -name DUPLICATE_HIERARCHY_DEPTH 2 -to rcv_s10_top|sys_clk_rst|ilkn_cd_rst_sync[*].rst_pipe|pipe_reg[3][0]
Somebody can tell me what is a secondary signal in this case? The asynchronous reset?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The optimization user guide explains exactly why this is not working for you (can't have any secondary signals at all, probably because the feature uses hyper-registers): https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/programmable/683641/22-3/automatic-register-duplication-hierarchical.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi,
Can you share your .qar file? Go to Project>Archive Project.
Regards,
Nurina
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello,
We do not receive any response from you on the previous reply provided. Please login to ‘https://supporttickets.intel.com’, view details of the desire request, and post a feed/response within the next 15 days to allow me to continue to support you. After 15 days, this thread will be transitioned to community support. The community users will be able to help you on your follow-up questions.
p/s: If any answer from community or Intel support are helpful, please feel free to mark as solution, give Kudos and rate 4/5 survey
Regards,
Nurina

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page